Kodak kept a secret nuclear reactor underground for over 30 years
1–10 of 30 posts
Re: Kodak kept a secret nuclear reactor underground for over 30 years
#2The article ends with the news source they got the story from: http://www.techspot.com/news/48601-kodak-maintained-an-under...
The source is much cleaner than the submitted site. After reading both articles I feel that the submission is just a rip-off.
Edit: I didn't go deep enough down the rabbit hole. Thanks eli & falling.
Re: Kodak kept a secret nuclear reactor underground for over 30 years
#3There was a nuclear reactor in downtown Atlanta for 25 years.
Re: Kodak kept a secret nuclear reactor underground for over 30 years
#4UC Davis has one, even though the city calls itself "nuclear free"
Re: Kodak kept a secret nuclear reactor underground for over 30 years
#5The only really interesting thing about this is the claim that it was weapons grade uranium. I wonder if they mean the same thing other people do when they say that (for me, 90+% U-235), or if the mention of californium means it was blended?
Re: Kodak kept a secret nuclear reactor underground for over 30 years
#6UC Davis has one, even though the city calls itself "nuclear free" http://mnrc.ucdavis.edu/about.html
It's not in Davis or even on campus which is adjacent to Davis. It's on McClellan Air Force Base.
Re: Kodak kept a secret nuclear reactor underground for over 30 years
#7There was a nuclear reactor in downtown Atlanta for 25 years.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neely_Nuclear_Research_Center link to details of that reactor for anyone interested. Kind of sad that my alma mater had to shut her down.
Re: Kodak kept a secret nuclear reactor underground for over 30 years
#8The article ends with the news source they got the story from: http://www.techspot.com/news/48601-kodak-maintained-an-under... The source is much cleaner than the submitted site. After reading both articles I feel that the submission is just a rip-off. Edit: I didn't go deep enough down the rabbit hole. Thanks eli & falling.
No, actually that links to the poorly written gizmodo story. Itself a knockoff of the local paper, http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/20120511/NEWS01/...
Pretty sure that is both the original source and the most accurate write up.
Re: Kodak kept a secret nuclear reactor underground for over 30 years
#9The article ends with the news source they got the story from: http://www.techspot.com/news/48601-kodak-maintained-an-under... The source is much cleaner than the submitted site. After reading both articles I feel that the submission is just a rip-off. Edit: I didn't go deep enough down the rabbit hole. Thanks eli & falling.
[deleted]
Re: Kodak kept a secret nuclear reactor underground for over 30 years
#10The article ends with the news source they got the story from: http://www.techspot.com/news/48601-kodak-maintained-an-under... The source is much cleaner than the submitted site. After reading both articles I feel that the submission is just a rip-off. Edit: I didn't go deep enough down the rabbit hole. Thanks eli & falling.
I think this is the original source http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/20120511/NEWS01/...
and it's a better article too.