Or hire a static ip and expose whatever ports you feel like. Its amazing how far we've fallen from the internet of the 90s when you could get this done on most ISPs with all of a phone call.
Tunnelmole, an ngrok alternative (open source)
41–50 of 87 posts
Re: Tunnelmole, an ngrok alternative (open source)
#42Or hire a static ip and expose whatever ports you feel like. Its amazing how far we've fallen from the internet of the 90s when you could get this done on most ISPs with all of a phone call.
I also ended up with several worms infecting the Windows version I was running, part of why I switched to Linux and haven't looked back since.
Re: Tunnelmole, an ngrok alternative (open source)
#43Earlier quoted context omitted.
is the `host` part here a server that you run yourself?
yes
Re: Tunnelmole, an ngrok alternative (open source)
#44Is there any stand-alone open source version of the VS Code port forwarder? That’s what I really want. Not so much public access, just local access to ports on the remote machine that I can easily manage. SSH port forwards don’t work inside docker dev environments (and docker containers have to be rebuilt to export new ports natively), so some extra software is needed.
Re: Tunnelmole, an ngrok alternative (open source)
#45I maintain a list of similar tools here: https://github.com/anderspitman/awesome-tunneling I'm not sure there's a single class of software that's been implemented more times than ngrok-style tunneling. I keep finding more and more. Honestly it's a really fun exercise. Fairly challenging, but well within the reach of a single developer. I believe I'm currently working on my 5th incarnation.
Cloudflare tunnels are good, but Cloudflare terminates TLS certificates, and scans the traffic. People host on premise for privacy, which is moot if using Cloudflare.
FRP is simple and works, but it takes inbound traffic from open Internet. A vulnerability in it could compromise your environment. The transport encryption is customized (probably using TLS). It’s not a VPN quality software, going through audits. It may need a reverse proxy in front of it.
The ones that make outbound connections seem better. Ngrok pricing is not good, particularly when using custom domains. Tailscale funnel seems to be for short lived lightweight connections, has bandwidth and speed limitations due use of relay servers, kills my CPU, and requires a tailnet.
SSH reverse tunnels require some scripting with autossh or similar to ensure persistent connections.
Re: Tunnelmole, an ngrok alternative (open source)
#46Another free + open source alt (for Mac) https://github.com/build-trust/ockam/blob/develop/examples/a...
Re: Tunnelmole, an ngrok alternative (open source)
#47Is there any stand-alone open source version of the VS Code port forwarder? That’s what I really want. Not so much public access, just local access to ports on the remote machine that I can easily manage. SSH port forwards don’t work inside docker dev environments (and docker containers have to be rebuilt to export new ports natively), so some extra software is needed.
Using tailscale can solve this problem, and that's what I've opted to do since I was using tailscale already.
[edit] Removed an incorrect assumption. Tailscale does not require CAP_NET_ADMIN in userspace mode.
Re: Tunnelmole, an ngrok alternative (open source)
#48I haven’t look at the code for the link above, but I think I am going to build a self hosted solution in Go and WireGuard with a simple GUI.
edit: one other cool thing to note was not only was this service behind a firewall, it was also behind my mullvad desktop client on Linux. Will probably run WireGuard connection to the VPS in a container to avoid conflicts with commercial VPN.
Re: Tunnelmole, an ngrok alternative (open source)
#49I maintain a list of similar tools here: https://github.com/anderspitman/awesome-tunneling I'm not sure there's a single class of software that's been implemented more times than ngrok-style tunneling. I keep finding more and more. Honestly it's a really fun exercise. Fairly challenging, but well within the reach of a single developer. I believe I'm currently working on my 5th incarnation.
I still haven’t found an ideal solution, despite a variety of options. Cloudflare tunnels are good, but Cloudflare terminates TLS certificates, and scans the traffic. People host on premise for privacy, which is moot if using Cloudflare. FRP is simple and works, but it takes inbound traffic from open Internet. A vulnerability in it could compromise your environment. The transport encryption is customized (probably us…
I'm a fan of their approach[0] though. No termination of TLS, SNI proxying(I presume) to backend machines, etc.
Re: Tunnelmole, an ngrok alternative (open source)
#50Another free + open source alt (for Mac) https://github.com/build-trust/ockam/blob/develop/examples/a...
This one is pretty weird. All the docs about everything talk about privacy and security and Ockam Orchestrator. This last part seems to be a completely proprietary and undocumented cloud service. Why would anyone trust this?
The Portals for Mac app is an example of the type of thing you could build using the open source stack of protocols. The README (linked by parent) links out to all of the relevant parts of the protocol documentation to explain how these work together. The NAT Traversal (https://github.com/build-trust/ockam/blob/develop/examples/a...) part of the README is probably the best explanation of why the free relay you get via Ockam Orchestrator is a useful part of this demo.
As for why would anyone trust this: The protocols are designed so you absolutely don't have to trust the relay. Trust is pushed out to the edges that you control and so you're not susceptible to a MITM attack if something like a relay is compromised. The protocol design for all of this is open and documented, and was independently audited by (IMO) some of the best in the business, Trail of Bits: https://docs.ockam.io/reference/protocols.