Bruno: Fast and Git-friendly open-source API client (Postman alternative)
441–444 of 444 posts
Re: Bruno: Fast and Git-friendly open-source API client (Postman alternative)
#442Earlier quoted context omitted.
I took a lot of inspiration from Hurl while building Nap[0]. My next goals for it are a UI and/or a VS Code extension. [0] https://naprun.dev
You reused a lot of "concepts" like captures, queries, filters, predicates etc... I take it as a compliment, there is a place for everybody (I'm one of the Hurl maintainers)
Re: Bruno: Fast and Git-friendly open-source API client (Postman alternative)
#443Earlier quoted context omitted.
You reused a lot of "concepts" like captures, queries, filters, predicates etc... I take it as a compliment, there is a place for everybody (I'm one of the Hurl maintainers)
I did. And it is! The Hurl project definitely made Nap leaps and bounds better. Thank you for that. I wanted to take a different approach to how http tests are written (YAML, environments, parallelism, etc.), but for things that I already knew Hurl did very well (assertions especially, but also some other things like cookies) I pretty much followed the Hurl docs and reverse engineered them.
Re: Bruno: Fast and Git-friendly open-source API client (Postman alternative)
#444Earlier quoted context omitted.
So, what exactly was the point of your rant? You don’t care enough to read the manual, but clearly care enough to ask a bunch of questions that could have easily been answered by yourself with a modicum of effort. The home page even has an example of the file format, is even opening the page too hard of an ask? Did you just want people to do all the work for you to “convince” a random stranger? In what world is that…
Not my proudest moment, I will punish myself with a 1 month HN hiatus. (so don't expect an answer) I guess my take was what was his reason for answering what I initially posted if all he wanted was to RTFM me?