Earlier quoted context omitted.
How could you possibly arrive at this conclusion? Think of the most famous stories / literature works before year 1500 - myths of Ancient Greece, the bible, ancient folklore about fairy folk - none of it was produced for a market of any kind. You are unfairly taking credit for the fundamental human need of self expression, and assigning it to your preferred ideological position. Can you name 5 famous stories, before…
> How could you possibly arrive at this conclusion? Because I know what it means to create something for the market? > Can you name 5 famous stories, before year 1500, that were made ‘for the market’? Given that I've already pointed out that all such stories were made for the market, how do you expect me to answer this? Can I name five famous stories from before the year 1500? The Tale of Cupid and Psyche The Shahnam…
You made unsubstantiated assertion that lays claim to a millennia of human history. You offered no evidence of any kind.
> I know what it means to create something for the market
Firstly, that that statement itself is debatable. Secondly, one would need extraordinary knowledge of history to make claims about for thousands of stories written across thousands of years.
I cannot help but conclude that you are an ideologue and you believe there is no life outside ‘the market’ and when I write something in my personal blog, or invent a story for my child, that’s ’the market’ too.
I find this level of ideological appropriation repulsive.