Live data from Hacker News

Simple no bs persistent notepad

blank.page

11–20 of 21 posts

Re: Simple no bs persistent notepad

#12
post #4

Why would I use a Browser for a "persistent" notes? "Persistent" until I delete browser cache? Why would I type my notes into a website somebody hosts? People really fail to understand what apps are for these days. They are 1001 minimalistic writing apps. And all kinds of Note apps. The is Gnote for Linux that may not look as nice, but you can actually link notes with each other, and they are in fact truly persistent…

> not in some stupid browser cache.

Oh, was the creative tech demo glass not completely full?

Re: Simple no bs persistent notepad

#13
This is not "simple". And I'm not even talking about tracking, why is `all.js` a whooping 1 MB of JavaScript? For example, it clearly includes markdown-it but the website has zero Markdown support as far as I can tell. Spell-checking is the only non-trivial component I can imagine and even that can be plausibly replaced with a native `spellcheck` attribute.

I would instead recommend a beautifully golfed, and yet still quite readable and functional notepad app with https://xem.github.io/postit/

Re: Simple no bs persistent notepad

#14
post #4

Why would I use a Browser for a "persistent" notes? "Persistent" until I delete browser cache? Why would I type my notes into a website somebody hosts? People really fail to understand what apps are for these days. They are 1001 minimalistic writing apps. And all kinds of Note apps. The is Gnote for Linux that may not look as nice, but you can actually link notes with each other, and they are in fact truly persistent…

> not in some stupid browser cache. Oh, was the creative tech demo glass not completely full?

No clue what you mean, browser cache might even clear itself without you doing anything manually. This thing makes no sense.

Nowhere ever did it say Tech Demo anywhere, not in the HN headline, not on the page itself. No, thanks. And even as a tech demo, there is nothing impressive going in. It is stores shit to local storage, I guess. Lol, I just looked this up, and it was in Firefox on 2009 already? WHAT? https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Window/loca... I never used it myself directly, but I remember reading about some API that kind of is the new version of cookies that can store more and better and I think that is it. 2009, I would swear what I think about was newer, maybe I am mixing something up, maybe not.

It has unnecessarily tracking from the comment above, not sure if it even sends all your notes to https://plausible.io, and I do not care. For me, this fails as a tech demo or whatever the fuck It's supposed to be. Sorry to not get all excited about everything posted here. In 2009 it for sure would ;)

Re: Simple no bs persistent notepad

#15

This page has unnecessary user tracking, such as: { "n": "User wrote something", "u": " https://blank.page/ ", "d": "blank.page", "r": " https://news.ycombinator.com/ ", "p": { "branch": "master" } }

Given that this information is sent to Plausible, a more privacy-friendly alternative to Google, would people complain if it used Google Analytics instead? I'm gonna go bet they wouldn't.

Google runs on 99.9% of websites and no one ever bats an eye (haven't heard anyone complain about it on this forum), but somehow a less terrible tracking suite is noteworthy enough to complain about.

(Disclaimer: I have a paid Plausible subscription for my products because it collects much less data than Google, and I don't need to add a cookie banner)

Re: Simple no bs persistent notepad

#16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> not in some stupid browser cache. Oh, was the creative tech demo glass not completely full?

No clue what you mean, browser cache might even clear itself without you doing anything manually. This thing makes no sense. Nowhere ever did it say Tech Demo anywhere, not in the HN headline, not on the page itself. No, thanks. And even as a tech demo, there is nothing impressive going in. It is stores shit to local storage, I guess. Lol, I just looked this up, and it was in Firefox on 2009 already? WHAT? https://de…

I think there is a dearth of really clean uncomplicated software in the world, and many of us feel a kind of subconscious oppression due to that.

Anyone using this is responding in good humor to the psychological relief due to its design, an impressive lack of clutter. And isn't taking it seriously for its feature set.

Your reaction was so strongly negative, perhaps consider the positive response is on a different dimension from the one you are (no doubt correctly, as far as it goes) judging it.

Re: Simple no bs persistent notepad

#18
post #15

This page has unnecessary user tracking, such as: { "n": "User wrote something", "u": " https://blank.page/ ", "d": "blank.page", "r": " https://news.ycombinator.com/ ", "p": { "branch": "master" } }

Given that this information is sent to Plausible, a more privacy-friendly alternative to Google, would people complain if it used Google Analytics instead? I'm gonna go bet they wouldn't. Google runs on 99.9% of websites and no one ever bats an eye (haven't heard anyone complain about it on this forum), but somehow a less terrible tracking suite is noteworthy enough to complain about. (Disclaimer: I have a paid Plaus…

If you haven't heard people complaining about Google Analytics, you haven't been listening. Personally, I block access to it except from one "dirty" browser for pages that won't run without access.

Re: Simple no bs persistent notepad

#20

This is not "simple". And I'm not even talking about tracking, why is `all.js` a whooping 1 MB of JavaScript? For example, it clearly includes markdown-it but the website has zero Markdown support as far as I can tell. Spell-checking is the only non-trivial component I can imagine and even that can be plausibly replaced with a native `spellcheck` attribute. I would instead recommend a beautifully golfed, and yet stil…

thanks bro :3
Post reply on HN