Bitcoin Creator Isn't Craig Wright, London Judge Rules
1–10 of 12 posts
Re: Bitcoin Creator Isn't Craig Wright, London Judge Rules
#2Re: Bitcoin Creator Isn't Craig Wright, London Judge Rules
#3Re: Bitcoin Creator Isn't Craig Wright, London Judge Rules
#4[1] https://twitter.com/adamscochran/status/1761111031928033749
Re: Bitcoin Creator Isn't Craig Wright, London Judge Rules
#5Re: Bitcoin Creator Isn't Craig Wright, London Judge Rules
#6Re: Bitcoin Creator Isn't Craig Wright, London Judge Rules
#7Would the real Satoshi, please stand up... I used to ponder who the real Bitcoin creator really could be. You can go down a rabbit hole if you're inclined. They could be a group of people, but the consensus ;) seems to be that from his original participation in forums while creating the protocol, it was a single person. There's a huge amount of coin tied up in the original wallets he/she/they must have minted still t…
Re: Bitcoin Creator Isn't Craig Wright, London Judge Rules
#8This is the most believable discussion that I have seen, identifying Hal Finney as Satoshi [1]. By no means conclusive, but certainly believable. [1] https://twitter.com/adamscochran/status/1761111031928033749
But did Hal really learn+write Bitcoin 0.1 in a bunch of Windows GUI C++?
Re: Bitcoin Creator Isn't Craig Wright, London Judge Rules
#9It's absurd that you can make a claim like this without your name on a document without providing substantial proof ahead of time that you are the person behind the pseudonym.
Re: Bitcoin Creator Isn't Craig Wright, London Judge Rules
#10This is the most believable discussion that I have seen, identifying Hal Finney as Satoshi [1]. By no means conclusive, but certainly believable. [1] https://twitter.com/adamscochran/status/1761111031928033749
Thx for the pointer. But did Hal really learn+write Bitcoin 0.1 in a bunch of Windows GUI C++?