Live data from Hacker News

House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

nytimes.com

711–720 of 1001 posts

Re: House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

#711

This bill if passed and enforced could be the beginning of a very deep change of the structure of the internet. Since the internet developed mainly and the infrastructure relied on US companies, it was excepted that US will play nice and will not use this to cause problems. Of course, Snowden showed us that even American are not safe. Now you are basically telling each government that we will use our tech advantage a…

[deleted]

Re: House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

#712

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The word "reciprocity" cannot hide the fact that two wrongs doesn't make a right. We think it is wrong of China to censor Facebook and Twitter because that is what authoritarian regimes that don't give a shit about free speech do. For exactly the same reason it is wrong of the US to ban TikTok. And this bill has nothing to do with balancing international trade. It's stated purpose is to restrict China's ability to in…

You're muddling issues. China restricts free speech in all contexts, and also separately puts onerous requirements on or outright bans various kinds of foreign businesses. If TikTok is banned for geopolitical reasons, reciprocity reasons or whatever you want to call it, that doesn't change anything about free speech in America. It's not the unrestricted speech that was deemed a problem with TikTok, but rather the spe…

No, you are muddling the issues. This is about speech and not about anything trade-related. Banning TikTok is not equivalent to putting import tariffs on cheap Chinese electronic bikes or solar panels. It's not about whatever profits ByteDance makes from TikTok.

It's 100% about controlling the narrative. "Young Americans are turning against Israel — and you can thank TikTok" https://forward.com/opinion/574346/freepalestine-tiktok-isra... Can't have that happening in the US. The right to brainwash kids is a right reserved to the American billionaire class, their purchased politicians and lobbyists. You can talk about "geopolitical risks", "security issues", and "reciprocity" all you want but it doesn't hide this fact.

Re: House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

#713
post #649
post #611

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If someone wants to subject themselves to CCP propaganda, why stop them? If they’re that lacking in critical thinking, then maybe they’re getting what they deserve. It’s not like anyone is forcing people to use TikTok.

The funny thing is there's not really that much propaganda on TikTok, much less pro-CCP. Sure there's the potential, but it's really not even much of a thing IRL.

It doesnt have to be pro CCP. All they have to do is slightly boost anti US or anti Israel or anti Ukraine and it is the same thing. Slowly boiling the frog by boosting fringe voices and promoting them as common views.

Re: House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

#714

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>How many democratic governments have been overthrown with US assistance because it benefited oil or fruit companies? This century? None. The civilized world has progressed. Hopefully our Chinese and Russian friends can catch up some day.

How many democratic or non-democratic governments have been overthrown with Chinese assistance this century?

> How many democratic or non-democratic governments have been overthrown with Chinese assistance this century?

None, because we've stopped them (for now) at great personal cost. Unless you count that little tiff in Hong Kong. No biggy.

Re: House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

#715

I think the primary argument for banning TikTok should be based on reciprocity rather than moral and/or security concerns. We can make similar arguments about the negative effects of Facebook, Instagram, and etc. even from the POVs of other countries, but the key issue here is that China heavily restricts foreign apps and services from operating in their market. If China is unwilling to allow US companies to compete…

Because economists would have to acknowledge that protected and restricted markets are better for developing local industry than open markets. Which of course is true. But then they would have to acknowledge the whole neo-liberal experiment of open global markets is bad for us. It would also pave the way for foreign markets to follow in our footsteps and restrict google, facebook, and others, further segregating our digital spaces.

Re: House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

#716
post #530

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tiktok isn't "some website", it is partially owned and controlled by the CCP, which influences what content gets shown to Americans. A majority of zoomers get most of their news and information primarily from this platform, which again is under the influence of a hostile foreign government. (TikTok also spies on US citizens for the CCP, but let's keep this restricted to the free speech argument about the ban). We act…

Buddy if some meaningful proportion of your population is finding foreign propaganda convincing, your problem isn’t foreign propaganda. USA in terminal decline and, in typical fashion, it flatly refuses to look at itself and wonder why. American power elite has no one to blame but itself.

That and political reasoning is impotent in the age of internet connectivity.

Re: House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

#717

I'm a big proponent of free speech and the first amendment, but I agree with the reasonings for banning it or forcing US owners. China most definitely has their hands in the data that TikTok amasses and given its popularity it's not an insignificant risk to U.S. citizens. We all know how easy it is to manipulate users... aka Cambridge Analytica. It'll be interesting to see what legal challenges come up if the bill pa…

If you truly believe in the principles of free speech, no matter how offensive and evil and cynically motivated, then the logical conclusion of that belief is that adversarial foreign governments have the right to propagandize in America and to Americans. If you abandon your principles the moment someone invokes the foreign menace then you don’t really have principles.

People like to think of themselves as being pro-freedom because it’s hip and cool and they are brainwashed from a young age to be proud to live in “the land of the free” but the moments you interrogate those beliefs a little they start to fall apart. It’s more of a political aesthetic than a true belief system.

Re: House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

#718

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The US government is accusing the CCP of using TikTok to manipulate democracy. TikTok responded by attempting to manipulate democracy. They did they very thing the government trying to ban them is scared of. Doesn't seem like a smart move to me, I guess we'll see how it plays outs

Raising awareness about a bill in Congress and giving US citizens the tools to speak to their representatives about it isn't "manipulating democracy", it promotes democracy. That is a foundational part of how American democracy is supposed to work, the reps vote on bills but the citizens have the last word - if that's so unacceptable that lawmakers would change sides to ban TikTok in response then Americans should st…

It’s a look thing. Just horrible optics.

I get why they’d want people to contact their representatives.

But they went about it in a very tactless way.

Re: House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

#719

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Our Constitution also says, "The Congress shall have Power [...] To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations." Forcing a sale of TikTok so it's not foreign (with a punishment of banning if they don't), especially while making no such law for U.S. controlled competitors, is no more an infringement upon free speech than introducing a tariff or trade restriction on German-manufactured printing presses while leaving domest…

What if EU forced american companies to sell off their stuff to european companies? It isnt that easy.

What is the difference in making the terms of operation impossible or forcing a sale really at the end of the day?

Why doesnt google or meta operate in China?

Re: House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

#720

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The US government is accusing the CCP of using TikTok to manipulate democracy. TikTok responded by attempting to manipulate democracy. They did they very thing the government trying to ban them is scared of. Doesn't seem like a smart move to me, I guess we'll see how it plays outs

Raising awareness about a bill in Congress and giving US citizens the tools to speak to their representatives about it isn't "manipulating democracy", it promotes democracy. That is a foundational part of how American democracy is supposed to work, the reps vote on bills but the citizens have the last word - if that's so unacceptable that lawmakers would change sides to ban TikTok in response then Americans should st…

Maybe a bit naive to think that a CCP-backed company is doing something for democracy. Maybe, just maybe... I dunno...
Post reply on HN