Live data from Hacker News

House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

nytimes.com

471–480 of 1001 posts

Re: House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

#471

Don't be fooled by talk about security or privacy. This is simple Nation State realpolitik. TikTok is a propaganda threat controlled by a non-friendly state to the US. Any other way to look at this is naive.

But if Western people are generally not dumb, are patriotic and think rationally, they won't believe foreign propaganda, and so there is no need to ban TikTok, right?

> think rationally

Not teenagers, TikTok's main target

Re: House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

#472
post #384

I think the primary argument for banning TikTok should be based on reciprocity rather than moral and/or security concerns. We can make similar arguments about the negative effects of Facebook, Instagram, and etc. even from the POVs of other countries, but the key issue here is that China heavily restricts foreign apps and services from operating in their market. If China is unwilling to allow US companies to compete…

> I think the primary argument for banning TikTok should be based on reciprocity rather than moral and/or security concerns. Your argument is lame at best. Using your logics above, Chinese should ban all US EVs, mobile phones and network equipment on reciprocity. Tesla has a huge factory here in Shanghai, local government even offered it free land, it is fully own by Tesla, Tesla cars are everywhere. When is the last…

No US equivalent of TikTok is allowed in China.

Re: House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

#473
post #433

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What's being described isn't an eye for an eye, but tit for tat. And tit for tat is the norm for international relations and has been since time immemorial. Usually it's relatively dull stuff, like if country A requires citizens of country B to have a visa to visit, country B will as a matter of course require citizens of country A to have visas to visit too.

So if China bans all American literature and news sources, the US should do the same? If China deports all Chinese Americans from their country, should the US do the same?

> So if China bans all American literature and news sources, the US should do the same?

At least their propaganda outlets, yes.

> If China deports all Chinese Americans from their country, should the US do the same?

No one is calling for a return to the ugly times of WW2 [1], but banning new immigration outside of asylum claims and especially banning investment into real estate certainly should be on the table.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internment_of_Japanese_America...

Re: House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

#474

Nate Silver did a nice write up on the probability and implications of all this here: https://open.substack.com/pub/natesilver/p/why-the-political... When Biden passes this bill (which he said he would), I can only assume Dems will lose a large part of the younger voting demographic. If jot now, then 4 years from now. Because no chance in hell is China selling this thing, and Trump is already talking about how much h…

Agreed it's crazy, but it's a good political move. Everyone agrees we should ban it, but no one wants the blame because you'll have a huge amount of teenagers and young adults who will blindly hate you for it. So if you're the one who isn't in charge of the hard-but-good decision (or in Trump's case, if you don't particularly give much of a shit about it anyway) it's easy to just pick the most politically advantageou…

You forgot to switch accounts when you decided to agree with yourself.

Re: House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

#475

Broadcast news and radio are limited to at most 20% foreign ownership by default [1]. Applying a similar requirement to large internet news distributors seems reasonable if they want to do business in the US (even if "banned" they could still distribute content, they'd just be restricted in making money). [1] https://www.foster.com/newsroom-publications-The-Road-Map-Fo...

Broadcast news and radio are able to be restricted because the the US government owns the airwaves - there is (still) no meaningful regulation of the internet in the United States and therefore communications over the internet are protected by the First Amendment.

Re: House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

#476

How does this pass muster with the Constitution's forbidding of bills of attainder?

Does the US Constitution care about the rights of a foreign entity?

There are US citizens who have already invested in the platform.

Re: House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

#477

I think the primary argument for banning TikTok should be based on reciprocity rather than moral and/or security concerns. We can make similar arguments about the negative effects of Facebook, Instagram, and etc. even from the POVs of other countries, but the key issue here is that China heavily restricts foreign apps and services from operating in their market. If China is unwilling to allow US companies to compete…

Plenty of American companies operate in Chinese consumer markets, Apple for example. One fifth of Apple's annual revenue comes from China, yet the country never retaliated with banning it while the US turned the whole world against Huawei.

Re: House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

#478

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> If China is unwilling to allow US companies to compete fairly in their digital ecosystem, why the hell should we continue to grant Chinese firms unrestricted access to our market? I understand what you're saying and I actually support the ban as tiktok can be used as a giant botnet at-will by Chinas government, but an eye for an eye doesn't end well and the US is supposed to be "free" so this part of the argument I…

US freedom applies only to citizens and residents and not foreign govts.

Totally. This is the main thing agaisnt the free speech argument. We have also passed this same law in radio and TV. It's about influence at a mass scale more than anything. I don't know why we would want a foreign ADVERSARY to have free reign.

Re: House passes bill to force TikTok sale from Chinese owner or ban the app

#480

I think the primary argument for banning TikTok should be based on reciprocity rather than moral and/or security concerns. We can make similar arguments about the negative effects of Facebook, Instagram, and etc. even from the POVs of other countries, but the key issue here is that China heavily restricts foreign apps and services from operating in their market. If China is unwilling to allow US companies to compete…

> If China is unwilling to allow US companies to compete fairly in their digital ecosystem, why the hell should we continue to grant Chinese firms unrestricted access to our market? I understand what you're saying and I actually support the ban as tiktok can be used as a giant botnet at-will by Chinas government, but an eye for an eye doesn't end well and the US is supposed to be "free" so this part of the argument I…

an eye for an eye doesn't end well because nobody gets their eyes back

China can change their policy easily with respect to reciprocity

Post reply on HN