Live data from Hacker News

Reddit: Return of the Junk Stock IPO

forbes.com

101–110 of 112 posts

Re: Reddit: Return of the Junk Stock IPO

#101

Earlier quoted context omitted.

they killed RiF. i stopped going there entirely on mobile which was 90% of my visits. i never look at reddit when im bored now. on desktop, if RES and old.reddit stop working. ill never go back

RiF still works but you need to patch the APK with your own api key. There's guides online.

No thanks.

Re: Reddit: Return of the Junk Stock IPO

#102

What annoys me the most about Reddit is, that it's essentially just a rehash of Usenet with marginally more moderation features, up/down-voting and custom CSS for each group/subreddit. That's about it. If I were to attempt to implement a Reddit "clone", I'd merely spin up a couple of ISC InterNetNews NNTP servers and slap a web application in front of those. The only thing that Reddit did – on the interaction level –…

>I'd merely spin up a couple of ISC InterNetNews NNTP servers and slap a web application in front of those. If this was the only thing differentiating Reddit from anything other text reliant information service, why hasn't anybody come along and disrupted Reddit by doing something similar to this?

Because that's not why people use products. They use them because others use them or the reputation suggests others use them.

Re: Reddit: Return of the Junk Stock IPO

#103
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why do you think you enjoy doing that? Tangentially, are you below the age of 25?

I'm actually 72 years old and this is my retirement hobby. It keeps my mind busy and I find it amusing.

You are the hero we need but not the hero we deserve.

Re: Reddit: Return of the Junk Stock IPO

#104

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you say so. He single-handedly destroyed one of the best brands of the modern online era (tweet, Twitter, the bird logo) only to replace it with a brand identity that was stale 20 years ago and is commonly associated with porn. The site’s traffic continues to plummet and his investment is worth billions less since he unleashed his acumen.

He didn't buy Twitter to make money. He saw it as the propaganda tool that it had become, and bought it to rotate it 180 degrees and point it back in the opposite direction.

Yeah, if that was the case, he wouldn’t have tried so hard to get out of the deal.

I used to think he was a great businessman until the Twitter thing removed his mask. It’s easy to achieve financial success when your father owns an Emerald mine. Then you strong-arm people out of their businesses (look up the businesses he actually started).

Re: Reddit: Return of the Junk Stock IPO

#105

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you say so. He single-handedly destroyed one of the best brands of the modern online era (tweet, Twitter, the bird logo) only to replace it with a brand identity that was stale 20 years ago and is commonly associated with porn. The site’s traffic continues to plummet and his investment is worth billions less since he unleashed his acumen.

Yet I still can’t go a day without being sent a Twitter link or seeing comments on HN. Twitter will be dead when people stop talking about it dying.

It’s already dead to me.

Re: Reddit: Return of the Junk Stock IPO

#106
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Musk is successful despite himself, not because of. When he doesn't have a whole team of people keeping him from making insane statements/promises/business moves, the image of a successful, shrewd businessperson really crumbles. I'm not fooled by the illusion any longer, but I do understand it's hard to separate the things he's taken credit from other people for, vs the things he himself championed/implemented.

Congratulations, you've created an unfalsifiable worldview for yourself where Musk's outrageous success with Tesla and SpaceX has turned into evidence of his unhinged incompetence as a CEO.

Congratulations, you've created an unfalsifiable worldview for yourself where Musk's outrageous success with Tesla and SpaceX has turned into evidence of his competence as a CEO.

Re: Reddit: Return of the Junk Stock IPO

#107
post #57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You also have to fire a lot of management that allowed the org chart to explode in the first place. Maybe take a few lessons from the Elon Twitter playbook.

Looking to musk for intelligent, thought-through business decisions is definitely an interesting strategy.

lol, let’s see how it pans out for them.

Re: Reddit: Return of the Junk Stock IPO

#108
post #96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

He didn't buy Twitter to make money. He saw it as the propaganda tool that it had become, and bought it to rotate it 180 degrees and point it back in the opposite direction.

That's a really bold declaration, given how hard he tried to renege on the deal and how severely he tried to cut costs.

So funny that he couldn’t get out of the deal because he instructed his lawyers to create an iron clad agreement to force the board to accept. They’ll be teaching that deal in contract law courses for centuries.

Re: Reddit: Return of the Junk Stock IPO

#109

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you say so. He single-handedly destroyed one of the best brands of the modern online era (tweet, Twitter, the bird logo) only to replace it with a brand identity that was stale 20 years ago and is commonly associated with porn. The site’s traffic continues to plummet and his investment is worth billions less since he unleashed his acumen.

Yet I still can’t go a day without being sent a Twitter link or seeing comments on HN. Twitter will be dead when people stop talking about it dying.

What is twitter? I think maybe you mean the social media company called X.

Re: Reddit: Return of the Junk Stock IPO

#110
post #95

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Musk is successful despite himself, not because of. When he doesn't have a whole team of people keeping him from making insane statements/promises/business moves, the image of a successful, shrewd businessperson really crumbles. I'm not fooled by the illusion any longer, but I do understand it's hard to separate the things he's taken credit from other people for, vs the things he himself championed/implemented.

Congratulations, you've created an unfalsifiable worldview for yourself where Musk's outrageous success with Tesla and SpaceX has turned into evidence of his unhinged incompetence as a CEO.

I appreciate how badly you want me to love him the way you do, but the emperor has been revealed to have no clothes and I'm not happy to put my head in the sand to continue defending his intelligence/business anymore.
Post reply on HN