Live data from Hacker News

The Best Essay

paulgraham.com

91–100 of 274 posts

Re: The Best Essay

#91
post #59

> One thing I like in an initial question is outrageousness. I love questions that seem naughty in some way — for example, by seeming counterintuitive or overambitious or heterodox. Ideally all three. I believe it is possible/likely that the best essay in the world could not be realized as such (thus, it wouldn't/couldn't be the best essay in the world), because most people couldn't even get by one of these let alone…

Yeah. Imagine writing Darwin's essay on evolution in the 15th century. People wouldn't have been merely outraged, they would have killed him right away. And also today some possible essays may contain true and important insights, while being too taboo to not be immediately dismissed by society.

The dominant ideology of the era tends to impose its beliefs on the masses, perhaps some day humans can wake up from the dream.

Re: The Best Essay

#92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How can you claim your knowledge of the field is actually deep, if you’ve never even done anything with it? Knowledge without application is nothing, imo. True “depth” comes from the know-how acquired in digging through all the minutia nobody else though to document, on your way to producing a new creation nobody else thought to build.

While I think there's some truth to yours and some of the sibling comments here, I think a lot of the discourse around documentation is actually just motivated reasoning. The trope that software projects are poorly documented is so pervasive as to be saying nothing at this point. Despite extremely useful and celebrated documentation projects (MDN and Python off the top of my head) that dramatically accelerate other p…

[deleted]

Re: The Best Essay

#93
> There is, and on the face of it, it seems almost identical to the one I started with. Instead of asking what would the best essay be? I should have asked how do you write essays well? Though these seem only phrasing apart, their answers diverge. The answer to the first question, as we've seen, isn't really about essay writing. The second question forces it to be.

I'm reminded of a philosophy joke:

An angel came down for a meeting of the American Philosophical Association. Greeting the assembled philosophers, the angel offered to answer any single question for them. Immediately the philosophers set to arguing about what they should ask. So the angel said, “Alright, you figure out what you want to ask. I’ll come back tomorrow.” And he left the philosophers to deliberate.

As the philosophers argued about the best question to ask, one philosopher suggested: “What is the best question to ask?”, in the hope that some day another angel might make a similar offer, at which point they could then ask the best question. But this suggestion was rejected by those who feared that no such opportunity would arise and did not want to waste their only question.

Another philosopher suggested asking "What is the answer to the best question we could ask?" Which was roundly criticized because of the possibility that the answer would give no hint to the question it answered. One philosopher cheekily pointed out that the angel might reply "42 of course."

Finally, the philosophers agreed on the following question: “What is the ordered pair whose first member is the best question to ask, and whose second member is the answer to that question?” Satisfied with their decision, the philosophers went to bed.

The next day, they posed their question, and the angel replied: “Of course: it is the ordered pair whose first member is the question you just asked, and whose second member is the answer I am now giving.” And then he disappeared.

Re: The Best Essay

#95

> Writing about the best essay implies there is such a thing, which pseudo-intellectuals will dismiss as reductive, though it follows necessarily from the possibility of one essay being better than another. Not to be a pseudo-intellectual, but this confuses partial orderings and total orderings. It makes for a fun discussion, but I hope Paul would agree that there's obviously no "best essay", real or hypothetical.

Paul has been putting me off lately. Everyone that disagrees with him is a "pseudo-intellectual" or some other hinted-at bad or incomplete person. The guy loves the smell of his own farts and isn't the towering intellectual or writer than he congratulates himself as.

Re: The Best Essay

#97
post #93

> There is, and on the face of it, it seems almost identical to the one I started with. Instead of asking what would the best essay be? I should have asked how do you write essays well? Though these seem only phrasing apart, their answers diverge. The answer to the first question, as we've seen, isn't really about essay writing. The second question forces it to be. I'm reminded of a philosophy joke: An angel came dow…

...I don't think I get it. Like, if the angel is going to be a jerk, he could be a jerk with any question.

The philosophers could have asked "What is the meaning of life?" and the angel would answer "Of course, it is the meaning of life," without any of this ordered pair nonsense.

Re: The Best Essay

#98

This is not the best essay, this is just a tribute.

> “Write the best essay in the world, or I'll eat your soul.”

— some shiny demon in the middle of some long and lonely road

All it takes is motivation. A lesson there for all of us, I think

Re: The Best Essay

#100

> The best essay would be on the most important topic you could tell people something surprising about. The premise is wrong (or at least not obviously right) IMO, so I have a hard time taking any of the rest of it seriously. Could the best essay not be the most emotionally moving? The best when heard aloud? The most convincing call to action? The most accurate? The highest grossing? Driving the most engagement? What…

Well, yes exactly.

On the most important topic you could tell people something surprising about. And all those things you said. And … and (yes, that “and”) … so much more!

We are talking about the join of all essay joins. The essay supremum. By definition

I think we can agree there is a limit to the length of this essay. Proof by absurdum: if the essay is too long to read, that would imply unread word choices make a difference. So there is finite length N.

Now we just search for it. Unleash the monkeys! Or today, unleash the competitive adversarial AI cohort!

We can find it, just not copyright it. Which I think, is the best outcome for humanity. Assuming this essay is aligned with our interests, but we have set that unboxing in motion now so it’s not worth worrying about

I think it’s best to maintain some humor when talking about mythical bests, one way or another

Post reply on HN