Live data from Hacker News

Technical Skills Are Overrated. Focus on Your Attitude

scarletink.com

21–30 of 79 posts

Re: Technical Skills Are Overrated. Focus on Your Attitude

#21
My opinion is that attitude is a big deal, in some teams/orgs it's more important than technical skills.

However, not everyone (self included) has good enough in-person ability to emit a positive attitude. I've had a person come up to me and tell me I look too serious while I'm in the middle of serious and challenging technical work. I can't be immersed in technical work and appear approchable or happy unless maybe I practice putting on a fake smile.

When I'm working from home, you can't see my face, based on my chat responses you will think I have a great attitude.

The most productice and objectively succesful year of my career was during covid and it was downhill after they started forcing to have office days.

Not only that, back in the day when I did shift work, I chose nightshift despite my managers telling me my skills could be more useful during the day. I made that choice because like wfh, interactions were remote (plus no distractions), the social aspect of getting people to think positively of you is much easier remotely.

I can't speak for others, but personally, I spent almost no time socializing outside of work, I have "no life", I spent most of my time socializing on the internet or having fun with tech stuff (or just watching movies).

I had a senior manager give me some good news once, I thanked him and told him how grateful I was. My manager later on tells me the senior manager thought I was unhappy. I have no idea what I could have said or sounded/appeared like to indicate my positive reception of the news. I would love to learn and practice such skills but until then, in-person is a major barrier for me.

Re: Technical Skills Are Overrated. Focus on Your Attitude

#22
If you've ever played for a high level competitive team, you'd know this is moreso true than the reverse (though technical skills definitely matter a lot). If you play in a Hall of Fame guild in World of Warcraft (top 200 guilds to clear Mythic in the World), they evaluate you in two ways. Number one is how you respond to criticism, and number two is how competent are you playing compared to others at a similar level that play your class and role. It's number one first, because those that want to be the best typically will have a great attitude toward failures. It's also because attitudes rub off on others you interact with a lot, so you're bringing everyone down if you complain, shift blame, take it personally, etc. The amount technical skills matter here is just that you won't get into one of these guilds without good parses and full mythic clears already.

Re: Technical Skills Are Overrated. Focus on Your Attitude

#23
I’ve worked with these cheerleader types. They have mastered the art of not doing any work, always nauseously happy about everything, even when it’s not appropriate for the situation, and are nowhere to be found when a project or task is due and you need help. In the worse cases, they play politics and actively undermine anyone who is critical of them or point out their (lack of) actual contributions.

If someone is overly enthusiastic and doesn’t have the skills it’s not always the case but often they are running a game on you.

Re: Technical Skills Are Overrated. Focus on Your Attitude

#25
I hope that more employers start to value other skills in additional to technical skills. It’s absurd to me that you can be a successful software engineer, but will likely be unable to land a new job without dedicating time to brushing up on Leetcode-style programming questions. Investing time on this won’t make you better at your current job and as simply a gatekeeping exercise.

Re: Technical Skills Are Overrated. Focus on Your Attitude

#26
post #13

I don't agree - it's about equal A certain level of soft skills and attitude is required to function as a member of a team. A certain level of technical skills is required to do the job. Both have a minimum bar to clear and you shouldn't hire an asshole genius just like you shouldn't inept social butterfly or whatever the genius equivalent is for soft skills. Once the bar is cleared you look at being better than requ…

The author didn’t say the aren’t equal, at least, just technical is overrated. And I’d tend to agree. We historical weigh technical skills at like 95% of the assessment. It probably should be more like 60% and as we’ve moved in that direction we’ve had much better hires.

Re: Technical Skills Are Overrated. Focus on Your Attitude

#27
post #6

It is definitely an attitude thing. However, you shouldn’t be focusing on improving your soft skills so much as it’s improving your mindset, and then the soft skills will just flow like hot butter. This is what I tell my friends: Don’t see interviews as an adversarial thing. At the end of the day, your mindset should be: * The company is looking for someone to do a specific job * You have a unique set of skills and y…

I agree with everything you're saying here

Also, in reading your post I noticed a normal human tendency that makes me wonder if hiring by interview doesn't inevitably introduce a small but pervasive organizational tendency toward a brittle culture

Notice that when describing your notion of alignment, you say you look for candidates who "do things like [you] do." I think that's insightful, true across interviewers, and from the perspective of organization-building, already a slight misalignment! I think humans tend to select for people who think more similarly to them, but the organizations I've seen that are the most creative and resilient are ones where people think as differently from each other as is possible (especially in terms of how they do things) while still being compatible (past a certain threshold I do think dissimilarity can make it impossible to agree or collaborate)

I know it seems like a small thing, but in aggregate I think it does a lot to explain a few larger-scale problems

Re: Technical Skills Are Overrated. Focus on Your Attitude

#28

I’ve worked with these cheerleader types. They have mastered the art of not doing any work, always nauseously happy about everything, even when it’s not appropriate for the situation, and are nowhere to be found when a project or task is due and you need help. In the worse cases, they play politics and actively undermine anyone who is critical of them or point out their (lack of) actual contributions. If someone is o…

I'd rather work with a slightly less qualified person who has a positive attitude than an overqualified person with a terrible attitude. The second type might write great code, but is energy draining for the whole team.

Re: Technical Skills Are Overrated. Focus on Your Attitude

#29
post #25

I hope that more employers start to value other skills in additional to technical skills. It’s absurd to me that you can be a successful software engineer, but will likely be unable to land a new job without dedicating time to brushing up on Leetcode-style programming questions. Investing time on this won’t make you better at your current job and as simply a gatekeeping exercise.

Yeah it’s pretty stupid but everyone is willing to play the game since we all need to eat.

I did drop out of Facebooks interview process right after the recruiter told me i need to come up with a better reason why i wanted to work at facebook for the next interview. I told them i thought they were going a little too far and I didn’t want to work at a company that was that full of themselves.

Re: Technical Skills Are Overrated. Focus on Your Attitude

#30
After years of upping the ante by ratcheting up what is expected for a technical interview, only to realize you've merely attracted people who are good at cramming for technical interviews, we're told now all that is overrated.

Maybe the whole time, people should have considered what adds value to the company instead of treating it as an entrance examination. A coding problem is appropriate if they're right out of school and you can't get a good feel for them, but usually, holding a conversation for an hour or so is enough to get a feel for whether or not this person can do the job you have in find, or think of a job they could do.

If having the disposition of a golden retriever is good for a particular role, then that's what you look for. A better soft skill, in my opinion, is knowing where to pick your battles and not arguing endlessly about everything else.

Post reply on HN