Subjective cognitive decline is a 'subjective' because it is perceived by the individual themselves. This means one of: 1) Weed dramatically reduces cognitive impairment. 2) Weed dramatically reduces an individual's ability to accurately asses their cognitive ability. 3) People who use weed are, for some other reason, dramatically less likely to suffer from cognitive impairment, or dramatically less able to accuratel…
I go with 4 for basically any study until it is verified independently. One big reason I tend to avoid science "news"
Association between cannabis use and subjective cognitive decline
31–40 of 60 posts
Re: Association between cannabis use and subjective cognitive decline
#32Subjective cognitive decline is a 'subjective' because it is perceived by the individual themselves. This means one of: 1) Weed dramatically reduces cognitive impairment. 2) Weed dramatically reduces an individual's ability to accurately asses their cognitive ability. 3) People who use weed are, for some other reason, dramatically less likely to suffer from cognitive impairment, or dramatically less able to accuratel…
It’s likely 1. Most adults are busy reducing brain cell count thru use of alcohol and other poisons. Marijuana on the other hand is proven to increase brain cell count thru neurogenesis in the hippocampus [1]. This is not possible for adults without marijuana [2]. [1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16224541/ [2] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/research-news/1588/
EX: https://academic.oup.com/sleep/article/44/2/zsaa173/5986548
However, growing evidence suggests that new cells are not only “born” constitutively in the adult hypothalamus, but many of these cells also differentiate into neurons and glia and serve specific functions.
Re: Association between cannabis use and subjective cognitive decline
#33> Compared to non-users, non-medical cannabis use was significantly associated with 96% decreased odds of SCD (aOR=0.04, 95% CI=0.01-0.44, pI'm not a native speaker but if non-medical use of cannabis has a different outcome than medical and mixed use than it seems plausible that there are other - more important - factors at play or do I misunderstand the paragraph?
Re: Association between cannabis use and subjective cognitive decline
#34A few thoughts after having read only the abstract: 1. The decline (which is reported to be less frequent in cannabis users) is self-reported subjective cognitive decline based on users’ experience. 2. I think that one of the hallmarks of cannabis use is an immediate decline in short-term memory. I believe this usually reverses itself after some time (hours or days). 3. I have used a lot of cannabis in the past. I st…
Yes, much has changed since the time of Dave. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ACfNSqsi_mE Probably your last point is key. Even a little dab will do ya nowadays or you'll forget what I was talking about. Wait.
Re: Association between cannabis use and subjective cognitive decline
#35Subjective cognitive decline is a 'subjective' because it is perceived by the individual themselves. This means one of: 1) Weed dramatically reduces cognitive impairment. 2) Weed dramatically reduces an individual's ability to accurately asses their cognitive ability. 3) People who use weed are, for some other reason, dramatically less likely to suffer from cognitive impairment, or dramatically less able to accuratel…
It’s likely 1. Most adults are busy reducing brain cell count thru use of alcohol and other poisons. Marijuana on the other hand is proven to increase brain cell count thru neurogenesis in the hippocampus [1]. This is not possible for adults without marijuana [2]. [1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16224541/ [2] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/research-news/1588/
Re: Association between cannabis use and subjective cognitive decline
#36Subjective cognitive decline is a 'subjective' because it is perceived by the individual themselves. This means one of: 1) Weed dramatically reduces cognitive impairment. 2) Weed dramatically reduces an individual's ability to accurately asses their cognitive ability. 3) People who use weed are, for some other reason, dramatically less likely to suffer from cognitive impairment, or dramatically less able to accuratel…
One thing I've noticed with pot smokers is that many seem to be almost in love with the drug. I have had people try to explain to me the manifold benefits of hemp fibers or CBD or how cannabis kills cancers. I think this could quite plausibly extend to survey answers, where saying they suffer from cognitive decline would be a kind of admission of defeat and go against their core beliefs of cannabis as purely positive godly thing.
So basically some kind of psycho-cultural defense mechanism?
Re: Association between cannabis use and subjective cognitive decline
#37> The reason for cannabis use, but not frequency and method, is associated with SCD. Further research is needed to investigate the mechanisms that may contribute to the observed associations between non-medical cannabis use and decreased odds of SCD.
Re: Association between cannabis use and subjective cognitive decline
#38Just to be clear, 96% decreased odds of cognitive decline = good? Rather confusing way to put it
Re: Association between cannabis use and subjective cognitive decline
#39Subjective cognitive decline is a 'subjective' because it is perceived by the individual themselves. This means one of: 1) Weed dramatically reduces cognitive impairment. 2) Weed dramatically reduces an individual's ability to accurately asses their cognitive ability. 3) People who use weed are, for some other reason, dramatically less likely to suffer from cognitive impairment, or dramatically less able to accuratel…
I go with 4 for basically any study until it is verified independently. One big reason I tend to avoid science "news"
Re: Association between cannabis use and subjective cognitive decline
#40Earlier quoted context omitted.
I go with 4 for basically any study until it is verified independently. One big reason I tend to avoid science "news"
Is there a journal or news site that exclusively publishes on studies that have been replicated?
All signal, no noise. Entire disciplines would be absent from it