Live data from Hacker News

MKBHD, Fisker, and "the worst car ever reviewed"

twitter.com

41–50 of 76 posts

Re: MKBHD, Fisker, and "the worst car ever reviewed"

#41
Other reviews also voiced the same complaints. Here's one from November of last year that mentions things like the obnoxious animations: https://electrek.co/2023/11/21/fisker-ocean-review-coming-so...

I think the input lag on the accelerator pedal is what kills it for me, though.

Re: MKBHD, Fisker, and "the worst car ever reviewed"

#43

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1766231831345541571.html

Or the actual article that this twitter thread is promoting: https://www.morningbrew.com/daily/stories/2024/03/08/fisker-...

The actual source would be this: "This is the Worst Car I've Ever Reviewed" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xWXRk3yaSw

Re: MKBHD, Fisker, and "the worst car ever reviewed"

#44

> More people subscribe to Brownlee's YouTube channel than to the New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street Journal, and USA Today combined. In the recorded call with the senior engineer, he called Brownlee "this kid". Should have taken "this kid" seriously earlier.

MKBHD is 30 years old and runs a fairly large, surprisingly stable business in a difficult industry/market. He has 13 employees whose livelihood directly depends on his leadership.

The caller is a "field service engineer" - which I have been myself across multiple industries, and even while running a crew of 6 people with very dangerous equipment and explosives, I never felt like I was doing much of particular import or really all that much responsibility compared to managing people directly and owning a company employing them.

Re: MKBHD, Fisker, and "the worst car ever reviewed"

#46
post #26
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Marques Brownlee is a professional. Good product reviewers don’t accept money for good reviews.

Yes he's good. For phones, RED cameras and Mac Pros. Not cars

Which parts of the Fisker review did you think were unfair or uneducated ?

Re: MKBHD, Fisker, and "the worst car ever reviewed"

#47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or the actual article that this twitter thread is promoting: https://www.morningbrew.com/daily/stories/2024/03/08/fisker-...

The actual source would be this: "This is the Worst Car I've Ever Reviewed" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6xWXRk3yaSw

Not for the subsequent drama about the Fisker employee's antics.

Re: MKBHD, Fisker, and "the worst car ever reviewed"

#48
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Marques Brownlee is a professional. Good product reviewers don’t accept money for good reviews.

A professional is someone who gets paid for his work.

MKBHD runs a highly reputable company with 13 employees whose livelihood depends on his leadership. This is in an industry/market with notoriously obsessive fans who are very efficient at publicizing any controversial actions of companies/leadership like LTT/GamersNexus/TechLead/etc, but so far MKBHD and his team have avoided any controversy.

I don't know how anyone would say he doesn't qualify for the "professional" moniker.

Re: MKBHD, Fisker, and "the worst car ever reviewed"

#49
post #19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A professional is someone who gets paid for his work.

Not by the people making the products they’re reviewing. Marques Brownlee runs an extremely popular YouTube channel; his money comes from YouTube ads and subscriptions and his reputation is everything just like any other product reviewer.

You seem unaware of the term "press junket" - events where car companies invite press to fancy locations and wine/dine them. The top tier press are invited to that, and they're expected to have nice things to say or they aren't invited back unless they have such a large audience nobody can say no to them.

Just getting access to the press car fleet alone is worth something to a reviewer; if they can't get access to cars, they starve, especially if they can't get access before the embargo lifts; all the traffic will go to the reviewers who had pre-embargo access.

If they're honest and don't pull punches, and don't have the clout of say Top Gear - the car company's PR team will cut them off.

The way most reviewers get around being able to sleep at night is by focusing only on the things they like, and lie by omission. Any criticism is focused on subjective meaningless things like "this color is horrid."

For example: go read reviews of the VW Mk8 GTI, see how many reviewers tow VW's line about them "curing" understeer, and how many reviewers are honest about the press car being delivered with softer tread compound tires up front and harder compound tires in the back, to cheat and make the car handle more neutrally.

See how many mention that the press cars were EU models (normal) with a slew of features that won't be available in the US at all (not at all normal), like the fancier adaptive suspension system. See how many of them rave about how good the suspension is...a suspension the US didn't get!

Re: MKBHD, Fisker, and "the worst car ever reviewed"

#50
post #23

It's so interesting to see how every tech bro has opinion on everything car related nowadays.

Everybody using a car has opinions on cars. They're consumer products: you don't have to be a car expert to buy, operate or otherwise use a car. You might be just a passenger without any driving license and still have a strong opinion on some cars that you've been a passenger of.
Post reply on HN