This has a super simple solution that would break even Apple. Change the law so that any device sold must comply with the DMA for all EU citizens, regardless of domicile. Thus, any company that denies a EU citizen under the DMA, even if they live in the US, shall be considered noncomplaint. Also, to make sure no tricks are used, make sure to specify that it is illegal to require citizenship verification for DMA right…
Apple will cut off 3rd-party appstore updates if iPhone is not in EU for a month
61–70 of 80 posts
Re: Apple will cut off 3rd-party appstore updates if iPhone is not in EU for a month
#62This is very interesting because there’s really no reason for this limitation to exist with regards to EU users. The only reason I can see for this is that Apple knows their rules are so unpopular that users from the rest of the world might go as far as travel abroad or start trafficking devices to get around them.
> Apple knows their rules are so unpopular Are they? I know developers don’t like the rules, but I don’t know a lot of iPhone owners who feel particularly stifled by them. If they did, presumably they’d just buy an Android phone?
I don’t know a lot of iPhone owners who feel particularly stifled by them
Thank you for your deeply anecdotal brush off. Surely it makes those millions nearly imprisoned (try living without a phone) in the modern world by the corporate duopoly feel at ease. Just switch to the other side and solve all the problems.Re: Apple will cut off 3rd-party appstore updates if iPhone is not in EU for a month
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
Even if on-device location is disabled?
This is how the online casinos do it in my state. They require location access on mobile or a dedicated download for desktop. I recently spent a bit of time trying to bypass the location check (out of curiosity) and they have it pretty locked down. The key is they require WiFi to be on so they can get around GPS spoofing. I had even attempted re-creating all the SSIDs and other networks nearby my spoofed location but…
Re: Apple will cut off 3rd-party appstore updates if iPhone is not in EU for a month
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
> is the point in making it this complicated? What do they lose by fighting it tooth and nail? They don't want consumers using 3rd party app stores. Apple users have been plenty happy without them for years, too.
> Apple users have been plenty happy without them for years, too. As an iPhone owner I have been annoyed at the walled garden for years.
Re: Apple will cut off 3rd-party appstore updates if iPhone is not in EU for a month
#65Re: Apple will cut off 3rd-party appstore updates if iPhone is not in EU for a month
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Apple knows their rules are so unpopular Are they? I know developers don’t like the rules, but I don’t know a lot of iPhone owners who feel particularly stifled by them. If they did, presumably they’d just buy an Android phone?
I don’t know a lot of iPhone owners who feel particularly stifled by them Thank you for your deeply anecdotal brush off. Surely it makes those millions nearly imprisoned (try living without a phone) in the modern world by the corporate duopoly feel at ease. Just switch to the other side and solve all the problems.
Re: Apple will cut off 3rd-party appstore updates if iPhone is not in EU for a month
#67This is very interesting because there’s really no reason for this limitation to exist with regards to EU users. The only reason I can see for this is that Apple knows their rules are so unpopular that users from the rest of the world might go as far as travel abroad or start trafficking devices to get around them.
> Apple knows their rules are so unpopular Are they? I know developers don’t like the rules, but I don’t know a lot of iPhone owners who feel particularly stifled by them. If they did, presumably they’d just buy an Android phone?
Re: Apple will cut off 3rd-party appstore updates if iPhone is not in EU for a month
#68Re: Apple will cut off 3rd-party appstore updates if iPhone is not in EU for a month
#69Though I’m happy to see the 3rd party apps - I really don’t get why people even buy apple devices if they want to side load or do other such things. In terms of camera quality, battery life, or any single criterion it’s not like apple devices are the best anyway. As a side note - I really don’t understand the logic that leaves gaming consoles exempt. As a second side note - how is apple even determining if you are an…
Both cell towers and wifi base stations advertise the country code they're in. Every phone needs to know what jurisdiction it is in order to do things like route emergency services calls or what radio frequency bands to enable.
Re: Apple will cut off 3rd-party appstore updates if iPhone is not in EU for a month
#70As someone who used to be in the field of public relations before starting a career in software - I don't understand why they are doing this. Surely they realise that this stuff is going to end up on mainstream media and damage their image? EDIT: I get what people are saying about the App Store fees but reputational damage does cost money, possibly quite a lot.
So this is just a PR fiasco and a way for Apple to look like a comic book villain that spites both customers and governments, at no gain to itself. If this thing Apple execs apparently fear more than the Devil himself were to actually happen then OK do the calculus and ban what you think you need to ban. But doing it now is just silly.
Apple used to be a company that was famously good at managing its image, no more it seems. A slow decline into incompetency accompanied by a relentless focus on profit maximization is a classic sign that a company has obtained illegal monopoly rents in one form or another and needs to be brought to justice