Live data from Hacker News

Is it time to stop writing headlines that end in question marks?

elezea.com

11–20 of 39 posts

Re: Is it time to stop writing headlines that end in question marks?

#12
No, if you are copywritng.

A question headline attracts the reader to read the sub-headline. And that is the purpose of headlines (and copy). To get people to read smoothly until they take out the CC and buy.

Problem is that if you overuse it in a blog (for example), then your writing style will end up souding like an infomercial. Mind you, if you see yourself using linkbait to gain eyeballs, then your blog is just not worth reading (or advertising in).

Re: Is it time to stop writing headlines that end in question marks?

#15
I liked Jon Stewart's take on this question in his segment on the question mark. http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-september-13-2006/the-...

Cartman also uses the just asking questions tactic to antagonize Wendy in a South Park episode where he takes the job of school announcer. http://www.southparkstudios.com/full-episodes/s13e13-dances-...

Re: Is it time to stop writing headlines that end in question marks?

#17
Is it a coincidence that someone posted a comment here on HN about Betteridge’s Law of Headlines, just last week, which got quite many upvotes, and now this is posted...(can't remember in which thread, something about "is x dead?")

Seems like circlejerking and/or blogspam to me. Sure, it's a quite interesting theory but just post to wikipedia or the comment instead.

Re: Is it time to stop writing headlines that end in question marks?

#19
post #15

I liked Jon Stewart's take on this question in his segment on the question mark. http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-september-13-2006/the-... Cartman also uses the just asking questions tactic to antagonize Wendy in a South Park episode where he takes the job of school announcer. http://www.southparkstudios.com/full-episodes/s13e13-dances-...

There was a bit of a brouhaha about this a few years ago with TV pundit Glenn Beck as well. Beck has a certain style of saying he's "just investigating" questions, where he'll posit some extreme allegation, and wonder out loud why the target of the allegation won't go on record denying it and provide evidence. He'll insist he doesn't even necessarily think the allegation is true, but just wants the questions to be aired and discussed openly, and says refusal to do so is suspicious evasion.

In response, someone started a website wondering aloud why Glenn Beck won't deny allegations that he raped and killed a girl in 1990--- the website author, of course, claims he doesn't believe the allegations, but is just wondering why Beck won't address them publicly, and provide evidence of his whereabouts at the time of the alleged incident. Beck, of course, sued for libel in response...

http://scienceblogs.com/dispatches/2009/10/beck_tries_to_kil...

Post reply on HN