The bad case of Hacker News authentication usability design
11–20 of 51 posts
Re: The bad case of Hacker News authentication usability design
#12Re: The bad case of Hacker News authentication usability design
#13Re: The bad case of Hacker News authentication usability design
#14> Before I unintentionally start a flame war This statement would be needed if anyone thought HN was an example of good design and usability, I don't think I've ever seen a comment here claim that, it seems everyone acknowledges that HN was built to work (as in, do the very minimum it can to exist) and nothing more. The lack of polish with HN is part of the charm really.
I do agree with that. However, there's a big difference between polish and usability. The lack of polish may be charming, but usability flaws are anything but charming.
Re: The bad case of Hacker News authentication usability design
#15Re: The bad case of Hacker News authentication usability design
#16The other thing is that the login page is http rather than https.
Re: The bad case of Hacker News authentication usability design
#17Re: The bad case of Hacker News authentication usability design
#18Speaking of usability... your site doesn't scale on my iPhone, so I only see about 30% of the screen width and have to do a lot of scrolling to read anything.
Re: The bad case of Hacker News authentication usability design
#19The other thing is that the login page is http rather than https.
It does support https, such as if you use https-everywhere which now works on chrome.
* HTTPS Strict Transport Security http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTP_Strict_Transport_Security