I may get rid of my iPhone, this is just horrible continued behavior on Apple’s part. Nothing can be worth the damage this is doing to their reputation
Apple terminates Epic Games developer account, calling it a 'threat' to iOS
161–170 of 1001 posts
Re: Apple terminates Epic Games developer account, calling it a 'threat' to iOS
#162(via https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39617729, but we merged that thread hither)
Re: Apple terminates Epic Games developer account, calling it a 'threat' to iOS
#163Earlier quoted context omitted.
That is indeed strange.
I was going to start an Ask HN post on this very thing just this morning, so instead I’ll just reply here. The last few weeks, HN seems to be suppressing Apple headlines. They will be on the front page, but then drop off minutes later - despite being fresh, growing in votes and engagement, and being high quality articles. Meanwhile, positive headlines about OpenAI will be up for hours… Also, don’t blame the mod tools…
There's no special treatment of Apple stories or any other $BigCo stories on HN; the dominant variable is simply random fluctuation. If you're seeing otherwise, it's almost certainly because random fluctuation provides a rich set of datapoints to confirm whatever perception you're inclined towards. Mostly we're all primed to notice, and weight more heavily, the things we dislike. (Endless past explanations about this here, for anyone who cares: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...).
For example, if you dislike $BigCo then it will seem like negative stories about $BigCo are being suppressed. Indeed there are tons of examples of such stories not staying on the frontpage—but there are also tons of examples of exactly the opposite. How one weights these is a function of one's own perception, which is governed by what one likes and dislikes. People who like $BigCo are just as convinced that HN is biased against $BigCo, and find just as many datapoints to support it, and post just as many complaints about it.
These dynamics are as old as the hills and impossible to stop. All we can do is answer specific questions when we happen to see them. I only saw this one randomly; in the future, please use the reliable mechanism (hn@ycombinator.com) to get your question answered. It's not as if any of this is secret!
Re: Apple terminates Epic Games developer account, calling it a 'threat' to iOS
#164Feels like a mob boss sending a message. "We own this platform, we make the rules, and we don't care who you are or how big you are, you mess with us we'll terminate your account and revenue stream." C'mon EU, do something.
We own this platform, (we built this platform), we make the rules I don't see the issue with this... it's not like they're exploiting an inherited platform like Oracle with (everything), IBM with Red Hat or Broadcom with VMware.
I own my phone, I make the rules.
If Apple doesn't want Epic on the App Store, fine. But their current level of control over what people can do with the devices they purchased and own is absurd and has nothing to do with market size.
Re: Apple terminates Epic Games developer account, calling it a 'threat' to iOS
#165Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Apple be maximally aggressive From an observation standpoint seeing how Microsoft behaved in the 90's and onward, they (Apple) are behaving very similarly - almost exactly with what MS did for Windows back then. I have a growing distaste for Apple corporate/mgmt each day even though I am surrounded by their devices.
Apple has been dragged kicking and screaming into more consumer friendly positions since the iPhone was released. It took years for them to simply switch to a more open charging port standard.
Re: Apple terminates Epic Games developer account, calling it a 'threat' to iOS
#166[1]: https://daringfireball.net/2020/08/sweeney_hand_waving_game_...
Re: Apple terminates Epic Games developer account, calling it a 'threat' to iOS
#167Earlier quoted context omitted.
What if, and hear me out, execs could go to jail instead of just their company paying fines as if they're parking tickets? Would they still be as cocky?
> execs could go to jail instead of just their company paying fines as if they're parking tickets? You want to send an executive to jail for cancelling a contract? I’d be curious for a jurisdiction to try this. In my opinion, I wouldn’t want to do business in a place where commercial disputes can be twisted by a political insider into jail time.
Why does the concept of personal responsibility for decisions insult you so deeply?
Re: Apple terminates Epic Games developer account, calling it a 'threat' to iOS
#168Earlier quoted context omitted.
More likely, Apple needs to withdraw entirely from the EU and see what happens.
I think the main danger would be a (new?) competitor trying to become Apple, to fill the niche of premium devices, simple lineup, i.e. whatever image apple currently has. And they could do so in europe in all peace and once they are ready expand to other markets and compete with Apple. To me that seems like one of the biggest dangers of withdrawing from the EU.
Re: Apple terminates Epic Games developer account, calling it a 'threat' to iOS
#169Earlier quoted context omitted.
Both sides are authoritarian. One is a private company with more money than most countries, one is an economic union nominally representing the people of many countries. I don't know where I fall on this issue personally, but siding with Apple is probably more authoritarian.
People defend Apple like its the underdog. Apple has been Goliath for almost a decade. Apple under Tim Cook is more about making money than it is about making the best product.
Re: Apple terminates Epic Games developer account, calling it a 'threat' to iOS
#170Earlier quoted context omitted.
What if, and hear me out, execs could go to jail instead of just their company paying fines as if they're parking tickets? Would they still be as cocky?
> execs could go to jail instead of just their company paying fines as if they're parking tickets? You want to send an executive to jail for cancelling a contract? I’d be curious for a jurisdiction to try this. In my opinion, I wouldn’t want to do business in a place where commercial disputes can be twisted by a political insider into jail time.