Live data from Hacker News

Global Economy Approaches Soft Landing, but Risks Remain

imf.org

91–100 of 122 posts

Re: Global Economy Approaches Soft Landing, but Risks Remain

#91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Things are different now. The reality is that probably close to 80-90% of self-described software engineers face permnanet unemployment as they will be replaced by low paid "prompt engineers", likey from India. It's already happening and it's happening at scale. The top 10% will see enourmous income gains as they will be the only people left who actually know what they are doing and how to correct mistakes that can't…

While I agree great engineers will continue to grow in scarcity and demand higher and higher compensation, the shift to armies of prompt specialists is not just an overstatement. It's wrong. Why? The same was said again and again again about the offshoring programmers. Reality? Here we are with countless unfilled jobs hiring for senior enginners in NYC for over 200k per year. The gap, at least cultural, between a cod…

It might be necessary to hire more junior engineers to produce enough senior ones.

Re: Global Economy Approaches Soft Landing, but Risks Remain

#92
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry to be critical but if you are in tech and have been unemployed for years (especially if those overlap with covid) then you are most certainly doing something wrong and need some guidance. Even now the situation is bad, but not that bad that it should take you more than a couple of months to land some kind of tech job that can pay the bills.

[flagged]

Uhhhh

Re: Global Economy Approaches Soft Landing, but Risks Remain

#93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Lots of jobs have low wages, in fact most jobs are not high wage jobs. That doesn't mean the manpower isn't needed it means the jobs inherently can't support a high wage relative to others. If you don't like immigration, then say so, because your arguments make no sense.

If the wages are so low that the workers require government assistance, that business isn't productive enough to be allowed to survive in a modern economy. It doesn't produce enough (or its owners demand too much of the rewards, or its customers arent willing to pay, the "reason" is immaterial, those all basically are the same problem). The customers and shareholders aren't entitled to unlimited immigration to prop u…

Your comment is entirely political, and that's not an interesting discussion.

And that someone can have a job and qualify for government assistance is pretty bad, and worthy of detailed dissection, but it's got nothing to do with immigations, as much as you'd like it to.

Re: Global Economy Approaches Soft Landing, but Risks Remain

#95
post #77

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sorry to be critical but if you are in tech and have been unemployed for years (especially if those overlap with covid) then you are most certainly doing something wrong and need some guidance. Even now the situation is bad, but not that bad that it should take you more than a couple of months to land some kind of tech job that can pay the bills.

[flagged]

[flagged]

Re: Global Economy Approaches Soft Landing, but Risks Remain

#96
post #27
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On the flip side, tech was booming during Covid when a ton of people in retail, restaurants were affected. All industries and all sectors can’t always be booming without there being a perpetual bubble. We have trouble finding good engineers to hire, so I’m skeptical when I hear people having trouble finding engineering jobs. My assumption (could be wrong) is a lot of people having trouble getting work haven’t adjuste…

> We have trouble finding good engineers to hire And then > while I might have been open to hiring a digital nomad in 2021, I’m not open to that anymore because there are more “normal” candidates out there who aren’t asking for special treatment or unrealistically high salaries. Maybe these things are related. “Normal” has changed. The engineers I know have moved away and are very happy with the flexibility of their…

Yea I think normal is back a lot more than you want to believe.

Re: Global Economy Approaches Soft Landing, but Risks Remain

#97
post #27
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On the flip side, tech was booming during Covid when a ton of people in retail, restaurants were affected. All industries and all sectors can’t always be booming without there being a perpetual bubble. We have trouble finding good engineers to hire, so I’m skeptical when I hear people having trouble finding engineering jobs. My assumption (could be wrong) is a lot of people having trouble getting work haven’t adjuste…

> We have trouble finding good engineers to hire And then > while I might have been open to hiring a digital nomad in 2021, I’m not open to that anymore because there are more “normal” candidates out there who aren’t asking for special treatment or unrealistically high salaries. Maybe these things are related. “Normal” has changed. The engineers I know have moved away and are very happy with the flexibility of their…

[deleted]

Re: Global Economy Approaches Soft Landing, but Risks Remain

#98
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> We have trouble finding good engineers to hire > while I might have been open to hiring a digital nomad in 2021, I’m not open to that anymore Might be related?

From what I've seen freelancing for more than 10 years, most companies will rather go bankrupt than allow remote working. The only thing that can explain this perfectly well in my opinion is: manager ego. As simple as that.

General rule: When your explanation is that everyone else is an idiot, it almost always means that your view is far too simplistic.

Re: Global Economy Approaches Soft Landing, but Risks Remain

#99
post #56
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On the flip side, tech was booming during Covid when a ton of people in retail, restaurants were affected. All industries and all sectors can’t always be booming without there being a perpetual bubble. We have trouble finding good engineers to hire, so I’m skeptical when I hear people having trouble finding engineering jobs. My assumption (could be wrong) is a lot of people having trouble getting work haven’t adjuste…

> while I might have been open to hiring a digital nomad in 2021, I’m not open to that anymore because there are more “normal” candidates out there The folks who took advantage of the ability to leave the city and get a house somewhere other than the Bay or one of the three other cities tech was hiring in are older folks for whom moving back to be near family had some resonance. They've now had 4 years to build a lif…

Hmm. The way you put that, it sounds like you could to some degree "pay" talent by allowing WFH rather than with dollars. I wonder to what degree that is true.

Re: Global Economy Approaches Soft Landing, but Risks Remain

#100
post #27
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On the flip side, tech was booming during Covid when a ton of people in retail, restaurants were affected. All industries and all sectors can’t always be booming without there being a perpetual bubble. We have trouble finding good engineers to hire, so I’m skeptical when I hear people having trouble finding engineering jobs. My assumption (could be wrong) is a lot of people having trouble getting work haven’t adjuste…

> We have trouble finding good engineers to hire And then > while I might have been open to hiring a digital nomad in 2021, I’m not open to that anymore because there are more “normal” candidates out there who aren’t asking for special treatment or unrealistically high salaries. Maybe these things are related. “Normal” has changed. The engineers I know have moved away and are very happy with the flexibility of their…

> And they will refuse to work for organizations like yours that continue to hold regressive views on WFH.

Which is 100% their right! (But don’t then go on tech forums complaining about how difficult it is to find a job)

PS. My company is fully remote (and was remote pre-Covid) so I definitely don’t have “regressive” views on WFH. I rejected a candidate recently who said they wanted to work out of a van while driving the US. As a 100% remote company I’m cool with people working from different places occasionally, but at a minimum I want our employees to have a desk. I don’t want to hire someone for $150k who’s working from the back of a van. I might have hired them in 2021, but in 2024 not having a permanent residence to have an office in is a disqualification.

Post reply on HN