Over the past two years I've been working on a business in Vietnam and one of the (many) frustrating things I've had to adjust to is that other businesses don't respond to email here. It's my automatic response when I need information from a business to check their website for the email address and shoot them a quick email. What happens in Vietnam when I do this: silence... Unless the business happens to be run or ma…
It's because in many developing countries, phones are their only computers. They don't have a laptop. Therefore, quick messages is the preferred way over writing formal, formatted, long emails.
It's Time to Give Up on Email
31–39 of 39 posts
Re: It's Time to Give Up on Email
#32Earlier quoted context omitted.
What commentary would that be? What irony is on display here? Everything in this article applies to literally every communications media available on the internet. As group discourse moves across protocols and platforms, the same problems occur. I'm not sure there's a meaningful difference between "plonk" and "lol blocked".
Right, but Usenet died.
Re: It's Time to Give Up on Email
#33Earlier quoted context omitted.
Such as? I just can't think of another technology that facilitates the async behavior of email messages. I know some businesses just use WhatsApp but I don't love it. Maybe we would mandate everyone uses Microsoft Teams.
I talk to friends on Slack, Messenger, Signal, and WhatsApp. I virtually never talk to someone I actually know on email, a trend that started in ~2014 when I discovered Slack. I do still use email! But only for transactional stuff, like FOIA requests or scheduling local government meetings.
Re: It's Time to Give Up on Email
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's because in many developing countries, phones are their only computers. They don't have a laptop. Therefore, quick messages is the preferred way over writing formal, formatted, long emails.
I wrote short emails. Am I doing it wrong?
Re: It's Time to Give Up on Email
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
I talk to friends on Slack, Messenger, Signal, and WhatsApp. I virtually never talk to someone I actually know on email, a trend that started in ~2014 when I discovered Slack. I do still use email! But only for transactional stuff, like FOIA requests or scheduling local government meetings.
Is it an improvement to have a whole new vendor locked litigious monopolistic Electron technology stack to communicate with yet another person?
Re: It's Time to Give Up on Email
#36Re: It's Time to Give Up on Email
#37Re: It's Time to Give Up on Email
#38Earlier quoted context omitted.
Such as? I just can't think of another technology that facilitates the async behavior of email messages. I know some businesses just use WhatsApp but I don't love it. Maybe we would mandate everyone uses Microsoft Teams.
I talk to friends on Slack, Messenger, Signal, and WhatsApp. I virtually never talk to someone I actually know on email, a trend that started in ~2014 when I discovered Slack. I do still use email! But only for transactional stuff, like FOIA requests or scheduling local government meetings.
Re: It's Time to Give Up on Email
#39Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It's because in many developing countries, phones are their only computers Do you really think that people who work in offices in developing countries don't have computers? For sure there are many people here for whom their phone is their only computer. But those are not the people I am emailing. Besides, for it's development level, Vietnam is a well educated and fairly high tech country, especially in the cities.…
Well, how else can you explain why you don't get replies via email in Vietnam and most businesses prefer to use chat? Why don't you take a crack at explaining it.