Something about this article is incongruous. Consider the passage quoted below.
(1) What could it mean to have a harmonious culture that is not inclusive? How could a culture be inclusive without fostering harmony between groups?
(2) The author does not answer the question she asks -- -- directly, but the final sentence is a quote from a Korean woman: "We care about the opinion of others." Are we supposed to infer that Koreans have a non-inclusive culture because they care about the opinions of others? Does that even make sense?
The contrast the author draws between cultural harmony and inclusive things is perhaps reliant on some specialized meaning of the terms -- the author is perhaps using them as terms of art -- but I suspect that the general reader will find the contrast itself contradictory.
Why don’t women push for a more inclusive work culture?
In societies that idealise collective harmony, challenging superiors can be deeply offensive. When chatting to two professionals in Seoul, I introduced a little role play. In a hypothetical company meeting, I politely put up my hand and said,
“I would like to propose that we end our company drinking culture. When people drink, they may make mistakes, do things inadvertently, which can make others uncomfortable”.
I spoke softly and gently; I really endeavoured to be placid. But my Korean friends were shocked. Sang-hee grimmaced, “It lacks nunchi”. Minjun (her male friend) was equally puzzled,
“I would be amazed. I mean this positively. But why is that person imposing their views on others? Why don’t they just drop out?” (translated)
To ease their discomfort, I suggested a more sympathetic story. “Let’s suppose her boss was drunk and put his hand on her thigh. She doesn’t want to confront her boss, but wants to solve it indirectly”. Sang-hee was still displeased, adding
“We care about the opinion of others”.