Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

The Buckland Review of Autism Employment

gov.uk

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–20 of 29 posts

Re: The Buckland Review of Autism Employment

#11

Post by droopyEyelids »

I'm surprised to see that the report doesn't address any of the 'disability' aspects of autism.

There are people with autism who are nonverbal even as adults, who are not able to care for themselves. The challenges those people and their families face will not be addressed by any amount of awareness or affordances at work.

There is some weird tension in autism advocacy where the disability gets swept under the rug and all attention goes to people who have milder forms of the condition.

Disabled autistic people still need to be able to live with dignity and I think it bears mention in a report like this. Changes at work are only a part of addressing the issue- aid to the disabled is another essential component.

Re: The Buckland Review of Autism Employment

#12

Post by nickff »

droopyEyelids wrote: post #11

I'm surprised to see that the report doesn't address any of the 'disability' aspects of autism. There are people with autism who are nonverbal even as adults, who are not able to care for themselves. The challenges those people and their families face will not be addressed by any amount of awareness or affordances at work. There is some weird tension in autism advocacy where the disability gets swept under the rug an…

I agree that those topics are worthy of consideration, but it seems like they were outside the scope of the report.

>"The review considered five themes

    What initiatives can help to raise awareness, reduce stigma and capitalise on the productivity of autistic employees 
    What more could be done to prepare autistic people effectively for beginning or returning to a career 
    How employers can adjust recruitment practices to meet the needs of autistic applicants   
    How employers can support autistic people already in their workforce 
    How employers can encourage and support autistic staff to develop and progress their career."*

Re: The Buckland Review of Autism Employment

#13

Post by arp242 »

droopyEyelids wrote: post #11

I'm surprised to see that the report doesn't address any of the 'disability' aspects of autism. There are people with autism who are nonverbal even as adults, who are not able to care for themselves. The challenges those people and their families face will not be addressed by any amount of awareness or affordances at work. There is some weird tension in autism advocacy where the disability gets swept under the rug an…

You see similar stuff with Down's syndrome, where it's perhaps even more skewed than with autism. The best few percent are presented as if that's representative for all of them, but there's huge variation and many really are seriously disabled in all sorts of ways – but those aren't on the telly.

I think many disability advocates are afraid that focusing too much on the less positive aspects will lead to unfair stigmas and even discrimination. That's understandable to a degree, but obscuring reality rarely helps your own cause in the long run, so ultimately I fear it's self-defeating. I also feel it takes the piss out of the families having to deal with the not-so-cute Down's cases (i.e. >90% of them, and sets wrong unrealistic expectations.

Or simply put, instead of saying "no, they're not retarded", a much better strategy would be to say "yes, some are retarded, but that doesn't make them any less human" (or whatever the socially accepted term for "retarded" is these days).

Re: The Buckland Review of Autism Employment

#15

Post by giantg2 »

At least in tech the context switching is killer. It burns out normal people, but if you're autistic the switching can be especially brutal. Add in autistic burnout on top of that and it's a miracle anyone can stay employed for long. Reducing things like context switching would be good for all employees.

Wow, section 7 is like I'm reading my own journal (if I kept one).

Re: The Buckland Review of Autism Employment

#16

Post by bawolff »

I found this line interesting

>5.13 Respondents suggested that tools such as practical tests, assignments to be completed before interview and short-term attachments to the organisation would better allow autistic candidates to demonstrate the skills and aptitudes required for the job role. As one autistic respondent put it: “If someone is applying for a job as a violinist in an orchestra, they are not asked to tell the interviewer something about their achievements playing the violin: they are asked to play the violin.”

Re: The Buckland Review of Autism Employment

#17

Post by bawolff »

droopyEyelids wrote: post #11

I'm surprised to see that the report doesn't address any of the 'disability' aspects of autism. There are people with autism who are nonverbal even as adults, who are not able to care for themselves. The challenges those people and their families face will not be addressed by any amount of awareness or affordances at work. There is some weird tension in autism advocacy where the disability gets swept under the rug an…

Why would the report touch on a subject explicitly out of scope of the report?

A lot of things exist in the world. You can't accomplish anything if you try and focus on everything. That doesn't mean it isn't important.

Re: The Buckland Review of Autism Employment

#18

Post by crtified »

droopyEyelids wrote: post #11

I'm surprised to see that the report doesn't address any of the 'disability' aspects of autism. There are people with autism who are nonverbal even as adults, who are not able to care for themselves. The challenges those people and their families face will not be addressed by any amount of awareness or affordances at work. There is some weird tension in autism advocacy where the disability gets swept under the rug an…

The fact that the term autism is applied across such a massive range of outcomes is at the heart of the problem there, I believe.

Any list of "summary advice" can never ably cover that range. Effective advice for a formerly-and-sometimes-still known-as Asperger Syndrome person is indeed going to be hugely different than effective advice for a non-verbal non-independent person.

As the above paragraph implies, the world can barely even agree on names for the most basic sub-categories of autism. We've a long way to go.

Also it bears mentioning that people with milder forms of the condition have their own unique crosses to bear, e.g. imposter syndrome, having people treat you as a fraud by default "because you seem normal", and other fairly significant lifetime burdens.

Re: The Buckland Review of Autism Employment

#19

Post by TylerE »

giantg2 wrote: post #15

At least in tech the context switching is killer. It burns out normal people, but if you're autistic the switching can be especially brutal. Add in autistic burnout on top of that and it's a miracle anyone can stay employed for long. Reducing things like context switching would be good for all employees. Wow, section 7 is like I'm reading my own journal (if I kept one).

Currently dealing with this in a deep level and it’s absolutely crushing me.

Re: The Buckland Review of Autism Employment

#20

Post by TylerE »

crtified wrote: post #18
droopyEyelids wrote: post #11

I'm surprised to see that the report doesn't address any of the 'disability' aspects of autism. There are people with autism who are nonverbal even as adults, who are not able to care for themselves. The challenges those people and their families face will not be addressed by any amount of awareness or affordances at work. There is some weird tension in autism advocacy where the disability gets swept under the rug an…

The fact that the term autism is applied across such a massive range of outcomes is at the heart of the problem there, I believe. Any list of "summary advice" can never ably cover that range. Effective advice for a formerly-and-sometimes-still known-as Asperger Syndrome person is indeed going to be hugely different than effective advice for a non-verbal non-independent person. As the above paragraph implies, the worl…

I found the former situation much worse. I was accused (subtly) of basically taking it at least once.

High levels of raw intelligence can mask emotional stuff that I suspect makes a lot of the high functioning people not really that high functioning, they are just able to compensate a bit more and be less outwardly effected to their peer group.

Consider, as a parallel, the dirty looks and snide remarks someone with cardiac issues or some other invisible disability get for using a handicapped parking space when they “don’t look handicapped”.

Post reply on HN