Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: I don't use AI. What exactly am I missing out on?

news.ycombinator.com

11–20 of 62 posts

Re: Ask HN: I don't use AI. What exactly am I missing out on?

#11
The bash command line chatgpt interface has saved me many many context switches. You can essentially ask "command to convert all files in this folder to X, and do y, z", and it'll output the command and even run it if you like the command it outputs. This should be the standard interface for ffmpeg, which is basically unusable without stackoverflow. This has also helped me learn a ton of new linux commands!

I have recently been using chatgpt to estimate calories from pictures or descriptions. The few times I've checked, it's pretty accurate and is OK about providing ranges where it's uncertain.

I also ask it to tally calories for a day. It's got a chart of calories accumulated for me. It's so much easier than any app.

I often use copilot to avoid looking up syntax for things I should remember. I'll just comment / ask what I'm trying to do and it'll tab-complete that line. I rarely use it for boilerplate or larger amounts of code. But that one use saves me tons of time and context switches and is totally worth it.

I use ChatGPT for rough fermi-style questions. "How much does a cell phone weigh" etc. So much quicker than google, and better.

I often use ChatGPT to have an interactive learning session about surface details of a field I'm interested in. It allows me to find hooks into wikipedia or other search engines for specific topics to read more about, and to get questions answered quickly. It is second to none for this type of interaction and is really incredible.

Midjourney has taken hours of my life the last day or two. I love generating images in the style of this or that. For example, I'm creating schematics / blueprints for flying warships from the game highfleet, and printing them because they look cool. It adds some nerdy flair to my office. When I worked for NASA, my colleagues would do that for rover parts they've worked on, so I like the idea of capturing video game stuff as though it were important. If midjourney had a "buy print" button on it, it'd be dangerous and lucrative.

I feel like there's a couple startup ideas in this post.

Re: Ask HN: I don't use AI. What exactly am I missing out on?

#12
I'm not onboard the AI hype train (see my comment history). But I do use ChatGPT on occasion as a sort of specialized/niche/synthesizing search engine. For example:

- English is not my native language, and prepositions give me constant trouble. I've used ChatGPT to check whether a turn of phrase is idiomatic, if I'm using the right preoposition, etc.

- ffmpeg command lines! "I have a MOV file that I want to resize to 720p, taking the audio track from this external MP3 file, and putting the resulting streams in a MP4 container". It gives me the command line, works most of the time. Same for some esoteric bash loop constructs.

- High-level overview of things. "How does my short film become Oscars-eligible?" It tells me things. I ask follow-up questions on the original answer.

- Detailed facts. "Explain why a wide-open lens has a shallower depth of field than if I stop it down".

Basically I don't trust it to generate new ideas, but it seems to be OK at answering specific questions about facts that can be synthesized from existing online sources. I'm sure these kind of questions have been asked online a million times, so I expect it to get the answers (posted by a human) and customize them to my specific use case.

Re: Ask HN: I don't use AI. What exactly am I missing out on?

#13
The key to why I use AI is basically their tailored and to the point answers. Google tries to find prewritten blog posts etc. that may or may not hit the mark, and to get there you probably also have to wade through lots of ads and cruft and allow so many cookies to be stored. This often saves me a lot of time.

These tailored answers can even be tailored to different perspectives. You simply ask for the perspective you're looking for. E.g. "what is the problem with solar farms from a Republican perspective?"

But yes, one also needs to take care because due to how an AI is trained, they may have an innate bias and viewpoint even when asking for a different one. I've found that such "personal" points of view in conflict with some other are usually made pretty clear though if you're asking for another view. So it doesn't use to be hard to separate the two as both are plainly and separately made available in the reply if this happens.

But yeah, that's basically it for me. Tailored answers to my questions, as well as the generation aspect of course, where it can generate text or image content which Google can't.

Re: Ask HN: I don't use AI. What exactly am I missing out on?

#14
You don’t have to commit to Google OR ChatGPT.

I use ChatGPT for questions with some relatively long wording and also for queries that I know will have tons of ads and SEO-spam.

An example: yesterday I tried searching for board games that are cooperative and best played by two people. Google showed a lot of ads, very old outdated blog and forum posts. I had to navigate for some time to gather a list of games. A lot of open tabs, a lot of scrolling, a lot of ad closing.

I asked the same question on ChatGPT and it immediately gave me a clean list. With a few different good games that wasn’t in my Google-based list.

Then I went to BGG to check the games, as you can’t trust ChatGPT that much, but you also can’t trust that much listicles from Google.

Using both worked better than committing to one or another. Still, in this case (and many others) I think exploratory search on ChatGPt is better than Google. As I check the results later on a site (not Google) that has authority on it

Re: Ask HN: I don't use AI. What exactly am I missing out on?

#15
I am a bit of a greybeard around new tools, and even today my usage of ChatGPT is limited, so I will give my 2c. You're right, in most cases, Google + Github search is faster to achieve a certain task vs typing out your problem and waiting for ChatGPT to generate results (personal opinion). Nonetheless, here are a few things where ChatGPT saves a lot of time:

1. Generating config files: Eg, Webpack, Docker-compose. Describe your use-case and it will generate the config file you need. This is usually faster than perusing docs and looking for specific flags/options.

2. Generating CLI syntax: jq, cat, tar, find. The flags/syntax are so hard to remember when you want to do something specific. ChatGPT does a great job here in quickly generating the command you want.

3. Solving problems when you're stuck: When I feel stuck with a problem or an error message, ChatGPT has proven to be an invaluable resource. Even when the answer it gave was wrong, a little hint in there was enough for me to find the solution I needed.

4. Generating functions you're too lazy to write: Often, you know how to write a function but you're too damn lazy to write it. Eg, use axios, go to this URL, get the contents and write it to CSV. Writing a function to do this feels like a chore. ChatGPT is a helpful assistant in this case.

Overall, I think there are plenty of ways the tool can save you time, even if you're skeptical about changing your whole workflow.

Re: Ask HN: I don't use AI. What exactly am I missing out on?

#16
post #14

You don’t have to commit to Google OR ChatGPT. I use ChatGPT for questions with some relatively long wording and also for queries that I know will have tons of ads and SEO-spam. An example: yesterday I tried searching for board games that are cooperative and best played by two people. Google showed a lot of ads, very old outdated blog and forum posts. I had to navigate for some time to gather a list of games. A lot o…

You may want to look at using the Brave search engine -- it automatically has the "Brave Summarizer" result at the top of searches, which is powered by its LLM, so you don't necessarily have to decide on one or the other, but get both all in one streamline process.

I don't make much explicit use of AI either, but I have found that it does help being built right into my searches, as when it's just basic information I'm looking for, that summary saves me the time of clicking through results.

Re: Ask HN: I don't use AI. What exactly am I missing out on?

#17
post #2

This is a very good question, and I'm sure you will get valuable answers. My take: - More efficient than search engines at obscure problems, like configuring an unix tool. Help that you can ask 'explain step by step' - It expands the range of topics you can read scientific papers in. You just ask it any topic or keyword you don't understand - Good summaries of text that is valuable, but not worth reading in detail -…

It's kinda sad that Google _used to_ be capable of solving obscure problems.

I remember setting up my first Linux box ~20 years ago and distinctly not thinking that.

Re: Ask HN: I don't use AI. What exactly am I missing out on?

#18
Lots of great insights here. Personally, I use ChatGPT as a "sparring partner": I present an idea and talk with it to elaborate it further. Wether it's about programming, science, writing prompts or game design, among other examples. Another great use case is to use ChatGPT to speed up chores, like hard to remember syntax or functions that are easy but boring to think and write, like parsers. Or even thinking about how to build the architecture of a certain application.

Re: Ask HN: I don't use AI. What exactly am I missing out on?

#20
I’ve found chat gpt very reliable for helping with coding tedium and avoiding typing. For example, I wanted to refactor 10 or so to tests with repetitive setup to a single parameterized test, all I needed to do was paste in the tests and ask. It’s also great for writing simple happy path tests for code you give it.
Post reply on HN