Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's the difference between being a publisher/game developer and a hardware company. Hardware companies see games as a means to sell consoles. Game developers see platforms as a means to sell games. If you're coming at things from the perspective of a hardware maker it makes sense to be as restrictive as possible, since that provides the differentiation that sells your (overpriced) hardware. In addition, if your hard…
Is Nintendo even making money on the Switches themselves ?
Nintendo is suing the creators of Switch emulator Yuzu
501–510 of 709 posts
Re: Nintendo is suing the creators of Switch emulator Yuzu
#502Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yes, if you want to do it legally.
Nintendo made it clear that this is also "illegal". You have to opt for the worse experience (using the switch) otherwise you're the bad guy ...
Re: Nintendo is suing the creators of Switch emulator Yuzu
#503I knew that Patreon would bite them some day. Any time money comes into a "offensive" open source project, whoever feels they are getting hurt can make a claim a lot easier. Somewhat surprised they haven't yet sued Ryujinx (the other Switch emulator project) for also having a Patreon.
Re: Nintendo is suing the creators of Switch emulator Yuzu
#504Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's actually multiple arguments with zero proof there. - they didn't prove that Yuzu contributed to piracy (and since the amount of piracy tools on the Switch itself that's far from obvious that Yuzu is a first choice) - they didn't prove that the leak itself lead to a loss of revenue. And that's also very hard of an argument to make considering that this game was a huge commercial success.
If a device's only use involves copyright infringement, it's illegal to sell or distribute in the USA. That's how they went after cable descramblers and, less successfully, VCRs in the 80s. Since getting actual Switch game data necessarily involves violating the DMCA, Nintendo's lawyers will have an easy time showing that the only way yuzu can be useful is if the user violates copyright law, thus making the emulator…
The Copyright Office has become increasingly friendly to these types of arguments as well, though they have imposed some limitations on games hardware. The next set of rules/guidance they put out won't be until october (They do it every 3 years).
Yuzu isn't sold* as a product and unless Nintendo can convince the court that the mere act of emulation (or obtaining the console keys required to make Yuzu function in the first place) violate their copyright, then I don't see it personally. You can run code that isn't owned by Nintendo on a Switch. Maybe there is a reasonableness argument that people aren't using Yuzu to play Switch homebrew, but there is a homebrew scene around the Switch.
Re: Nintendo is suing the creators of Switch emulator Yuzu
#505Things like this and companies like Nintendo must be stopped, it's both morally and legally correct to emulate when people actually owns the machine and cartridges.
Nintendo has the right to protect their IP and they have the right to make money.
Furthermore, I disagree in general that it's morally and legally correct to emulate something you purchased.
Re: Nintendo is suing the creators of Switch emulator Yuzu
#506Earlier quoted context omitted.
Patreon about page begins: >yuzu is a Nintendo Switch emulator capable of running many games! With yuzu, you can play such games as Pokémon Sword & Shield, Xenoblade Chronicles 3, Super Mario Odyssey, Mario Kart 8 Deluxe, Pokémon Legends: Arceus, Fire Emblem:Three Houses, and Super Smash Bros. Ultimate — on your PC. Regardless of the legal status of an emulator, I wouldn't list game titles if I were writing that copy…
It's not illegal to play games that you already purchased and own. Piracy is just a convenient scapegoat to hobble emulation.
It's illegal to pirate games. Being able to emulate things you purchased is a convenient scapegoat for people to pirate games.
Re: Nintendo is suing the creators of Switch emulator Yuzu
#507Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hammers are used for theft, as well. Even if Nintendo's business would benefit from emulators not existing[1], it doesn't mean we should ban emulators (or create laws which allow multinationals to sue open source emulator projects out of existence). [1] which is not necessarily true
I understand your argument, and perhaps a similar one will be made to the courts. For some people, if a tool has a single legitimate user, and otherwise haa illegitimate users, then the tool should be allowed. For others, if the tool is mostly used for illegitimate means, then the tool should be banned. Where the law lands in this case will be partly based on these values, and the benefits/harms to all parties. I don…
The same can be said for gun use (not ownership).
How much something is used for illegal activities should have no baring on whether it is allowed in a free country.
Re: Nintendo is suing the creators of Switch emulator Yuzu
#508Things like this and companies like Nintendo must be stopped, it's both morally and legally correct to emulate when people actually owns the machine and cartridges.
Disagreed. I'm guessing that 99.99% of Switch emulator users do not own the cartridges. They're stealing, which is not only morally wrong, but legally wrong. Nintendo has the right to protect their IP and they have the right to make money. Furthermore, I disagree in general that it's morally and legally correct to emulate something you purchased.
Now, the real question is: did Yuzu's creator have illegal access to Nintendo's IP to write Yuzu ?
Re: Nintendo is suing the creators of Switch emulator Yuzu
#509Re: Nintendo is suing the creators of Switch emulator Yuzu
#510I knew that Patreon would bite them some day. Any time money comes into a "offensive" open source project, whoever feels they are getting hurt can make a claim a lot easier. Somewhat surprised they haven't yet sued Ryujinx (the other Switch emulator project) for also having a Patreon.
I'm actually surprised it took so long considering they were seeking crowdfunding while openly advertising the piracy use case and raking in thousands of dollars a month (now $30,000 - wow). Patreon rewards can be construed as profit-seeking; Patreon even charges sales tax if you donate under a reward tier (they don't if you go through the no-reward custom donation flow). It's cool to hate on Nintendo for being overl…