Live data from Hacker News

Dracula's Biggest Mistake

blog.ayjay.org

21–30 of 157 posts

Re: Dracula's Biggest Mistake

#22
post #9

On a related note, when I re-watch shows from the 1990's or even early 2000's it's amazing how many problems would be solved with a simple cell phone call or text message. Buffy the Vampire Slayer would be a much shorter show if the gang could just text instead of wondering where the others were or if they knew some key fact.

along the same line of applying modern day to older shows, I recently re-watched Stargate Atlantis. I found it amusing that with all of the futuristic tech, McKay still carried around a bulky laptop. Even the original Star Trek minimized the computer to a hand held device. The prop team kind of failed in SG:Atlantis on this one to me. How much easier would their off world adventures been with a tablet or other smalle…

STar Trek's handheld computers never made sense to me, unless they have some crazy good AI that does all the work for you based on vague inputs. How do you input anything like code quickly on such a tiny screen?

Re: Dracula's Biggest Mistake

#24
> Poor Dracula, he never had a chance – not against the double-reinforced power of a Catholic Modernity.

To be fair, he hoarded wealth, drank blood, and sought eternal life. If I were in a room with Dracula and his enemies, and you told me to point at the Catholics, I'd be a bit stumped.

Re: Dracula's Biggest Mistake

#26
post #24

> Poor Dracula, he never had a chance – not against the double-reinforced power of a Catholic Modernity. To be fair, he hoarded wealth, drank blood, and sought eternal life. If I were in a room with Dracula and his enemies, and you told me to point at the Catholics, I'd be a bit stumped.

> Capital is dead labour, which, vampire-like, lives only by sucking living labour, and lives the more, the more labour it sucks — KM

Das Kapital was 1867; The Time Machine, 1895. They sure loved their vore in the 19th century!

Re: Dracula's Biggest Mistake

#27

The author thinks that Helsing & company killed Dracula... and that is certainly the narrator's desperate belief. But as Fred Saberhagen pointed out in his more modern telling of the tale, Van Helsing himself maintains Dracula must be staked, decapitated and have his mouth stuffed with garlic to perish. And yet, despite this and despite knowing that Dracula can turn himself to mist, the heroes are content with victor…

In the Bram Stoker novel, Dracula is eventually killed, but at what cost? Harker must eventually drive a stake through his beloved Lucy. Dracula is a virus, not a man.

Re: Dracula's Biggest Mistake

#28

On a related note, when I re-watch shows from the 1990's or even early 2000's it's amazing how many problems would be solved with a simple cell phone call or text message. Buffy the Vampire Slayer would be a much shorter show if the gang could just text instead of wondering where the others were or if they knew some key fact.

Star Trek was well aware of that problem. They often encountered "ion storms", or landing parties got conked on the head and their communicators taken, or other ways of disabling communications.

That also disabled the transporter, which is a convenient way to get into stories, but also makes it easy to get out of stories.

Somebody somewhere must have done a PhD thesis on the way that cell phones have changed storytelling in TV and movies. I'd actually kinda like to read that.

A quick Google turns up:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/254345825_Mobile_Ph...

Re: Dracula's Biggest Mistake

#29

On a related note, when I re-watch shows from the 1990's or even early 2000's it's amazing how many problems would be solved with a simple cell phone call or text message. Buffy the Vampire Slayer would be a much shorter show if the gang could just text instead of wondering where the others were or if they knew some key fact.

That reminds me of this McSweeney's piece by Google's Peter Norvig: https://www.mcsweeneys.net/articles/stories-that-would-have-...

Re: Dracula's Biggest Mistake

#30
post #20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

For SG:1 sure. For SG:Atlantis, they had access to all of the ancient's tech.

They had access to a lot of Ancient artefacts which they didn't really understand; despite many oddities that came to mind since first watching it, I think it would still fit the setting that they didn't know how to get the Ancient's 3D printers (or whatever) to spit out better hardware — if they could make it spit out more hardware on demand, even if they "could only find one file to print", it would radically chang…

I really didn't like the direction that SG-1 and Atlantis took.

There was a novel that took place after the movie that depicted Hathor coming back and trying to take over with a simultaneous plot of the US trying to extract resources from Abydos. I though it was really we done and wished that SG-1 used it as the starting point.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stargate_literature

Post reply on HN