Ask HN: People who switched from GPT to their own models. How was it?
1–10 of 87 posts
Re: Ask HN: People who switched from GPT to their own models. How was it?
#2I no longer use llms.
Re: Ask HN: People who switched from GPT to their own models. How was it?
#3Re: Ask HN: People who switched from GPT to their own models. How was it?
#4I fine-tuned an LLM to do technical stuff. It works pretty darn good. What I actually discovered is that when evaluating LLMs, it is surprisingly difficult to evaluate them. And, also, that GPT 4 isn't that great, in general.
Re: Ask HN: People who switched from GPT to their own models. How was it?
#5Experience has been great, INT8 tradeoffs are acceptable until hardware FP8(FP4 anyone?) becomes more widely & cheaply available. On-prem costs have been absorbed already for few boxes of A100s & legacy V100s running millions of such interactions.
Re: Ask HN: People who switched from GPT to their own models. How was it?
#6I fine-tuned an LLM to do technical stuff. It works pretty darn good. What I actually discovered is that when evaluating LLMs, it is surprisingly difficult to evaluate them. And, also, that GPT 4 isn't that great, in general.
Re: Ask HN: People who switched from GPT to their own models. How was it?
#7Re: Ask HN: People who switched from GPT to their own models. How was it?
#8Re: Ask HN: People who switched from GPT to their own models. How was it?
#9I fine-tuned an LLM to do technical stuff. It works pretty darn good. What I actually discovered is that when evaluating LLMs, it is surprisingly difficult to evaluate them. And, also, that GPT 4 isn't that great, in general.
Re: Ask HN: People who switched from GPT to their own models. How was it?
#10Anyone has a tutorial how to achieve it to own a self-hosted model?