Earlier quoted context omitted.
ImageNet was very influential, but this just shows he was eighth author on a twelve author paper from almost a decade ago. Is there better evidence of sustained contributions to the field?
He’s first author on a ton of those papers. That’s a tenure worthy CV almost anywhere. Gimme a break.
OP shared a link to just the Imagenet paper.
Agree he had a decent overall track record at Stanford, but that’s not how tenure works — it might have got his foot in the door as an assistant professor somewhere. He chose a much more lucrative path.