Live data from Hacker News

Why Writing by Hand Is Better for Memory and Learning

scientificamerican.com

31–40 of 132 posts

Re: Why Writing by Hand Is Better for Memory and Learning

#31
I was late to this game of "going backwards" to improve my memory and understanding of what I read and wrote. Being raised by two technologically forward engineers, we jumped on the palm-pilot/laptops/tablets/phones/e-readers bandwagon very early.

5 years ago I started turning back to calligraphy, fountain pens, and hand writing. I buy books and fill up my bookshelf. It wasn't just for the memory recall, it was the pleasantness of writing.

I can't begin to tell you just how wonderful it is to write with a nice fountain pen. This was the culmination of writing instruments prior to the bastardization caused by modern cheap pens/pencils. I heartily recommend folks pick up an affordable Parker pen or similar and try it. It's also a great stress reliever to just free form thoughts onto a page, and you'll remember what your wrote later in the day!

One other bonus, your handwriting improves. I had to fill out some government forms recently. The online forms were cutting off any addresses longer than 24 characters, so I filled it out by hand. Went into the offices to submit and after the clerk saw my papers they went, "oh my goodness, you have incredible handwriting!"

Besides the learning, recall, etc, there are so many side benefits. Read and write physically y'all!

Re: Why Writing by Hand Is Better for Memory and Learning

#32
I think I need to actually read the studies for this, because this has been completely contrary to my personal experience on this. I'd like to see how they're controlling their variables.

I cannot read my own handwriting anymore, so I almost never write anything by hand now, but when I was in college the first time I took notes by hand in a notebook, and later moved to typing on a laptop. I don't feel like I retained appreciably less information when I was writing by hand, BUT I did have the ability read my notes later, in addition to being able to search and index them easily. Additionally, I type a lot faster than I can write by hand so I was able to write down more detailed notes during lectures.

Now, obviously, college-age Tombert was 18-20, not a young child, but I still do school, and I still pretty much exclusively type my notes. I've found that the utility of using Obsidian to be able to try and figure out ways in which things are connected is just as valuable to me.

I'm not a complete idiot; it's possible that I'm actually not learning as well, but I really have no desire to go back to physical notes.

ETA:

I would like to point out, I've always resisted the urge to simply transcribe what the instructor is saying. I always try and summarize/break-into-bullets, because I feel like the summarization is part of the learning process; reading the article it looks like a lot of people typing notes are just larping as stenographers, which I would agree is a terrible way to actually learn.

Re: Why Writing by Hand Is Better for Memory and Learning

#33
post #11

Anyone else remember less from reading an ebook compared to a physical one? This happens to me, and I think it's a similar explanation. I recall less of where I read something in an ebook. But in a physical book, I often remember that a phrase was at the top or middle or left side of a page, or that I was sitting in a particular chair when I read it. There's simply more of the brain working when I read a physical boo…

> Anyone else remember less from reading an ebook compared to a physical one? [...] But in a physical book, I often remember that a phrase was at the top or middle or left side of a page, or that I was sitting in a particular chair when I read it.

This seems weird to me. Does your ebook reader not have a "page" concept? I read China Mieville's Kraken on a Rakuten Kobo about 6 months ago and I distinctly remember the layout of the page where the protagonist does something that shows the culmination of his personal growth throughout the novel, or the page where you find out who is burning the past and why. I also remember distinctly where I was sitting when I read both of those passages.

The biggest difference between the eBook and physical book experiences for me is the smell--I miss the smell of the binding glue when cracking open a new book, or the pleasantly-stale paper smell of an old library book. I'm not saying that the eBook and physical book experiences are equivalent at all. I'm just saying the specific examples you're pointing out seem odd to me.

I'm also highly skeptical of the observations that come from a mind perceiving itself; one of the most striking takeaways from all the neuroscience I've read in the past few decades is that a lot of previous philosophy and psychology theory on how the brain works based on self-perception is blatantly just wrong.

Re: Why Writing by Hand Is Better for Memory and Learning

#34
post #11

Anyone else remember less from reading an ebook compared to a physical one? This happens to me, and I think it's a similar explanation. I recall less of where I read something in an ebook. But in a physical book, I often remember that a phrase was at the top or middle or left side of a page, or that I was sitting in a particular chair when I read it. There's simply more of the brain working when I read a physical boo…

Maybe the article covers this, but there an ancient memory technique (still used today) of “places and things”, also known as a memory palace. You put objects into spaces in your mind, then walk through that imaginary space to remember things. Turns out that humans are much better at remembering things when the context is spatial. Makes sense that this would apply to reading physical books.

This is why we have terms like "On the other hand", "in this case", and similar. These are used in memory palace mostly.

Re: Why Writing by Hand Is Better for Memory and Learning

#35
post #11

Anyone else remember less from reading an ebook compared to a physical one? This happens to me, and I think it's a similar explanation. I recall less of where I read something in an ebook. But in a physical book, I often remember that a phrase was at the top or middle or left side of a page, or that I was sitting in a particular chair when I read it. There's simply more of the brain working when I read a physical boo…

> Anyone else remember less from reading an ebook compared to a physical one? [...] But in a physical book, I often remember that a phrase was at the top or middle or left side of a page, or that I was sitting in a particular chair when I read it. This seems weird to me. Does your ebook reader not have a "page" concept? I read China Mieville's Kraken on a Rakuten Kobo about 6 months ago and I distinctly remember the…

When I remember passages from books I definitely recall whether it was on the left or right leaf, top or bottom or center, and roughly how far through the book it was. If I read it on an e-reader I may have some recall of the vertical positioning but nothing else.

I can take a book from a shelf that I only read once years ago and find a specific passage in a minute or two using this approach. For an ebook I have to try to remember a phrase and search for it, which doesn't always work if I remember just the physicality and sense of it, but not the specific phrasing.

Re: Why Writing by Hand Is Better for Memory and Learning

#36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A teacher and my parents both tried to improve my penmanship by forcing me to write page and pages of letters. My handwriting got worse each time. So I don't recommend that. I think you have to want it to improve, and to value it. And then you have to practice with that in mind. At that age, I was unable to see a reason to improve it, and it was a lot of work, so I didn't put any actual effort into it beyond that tor…

> A teacher and my parents both tried to improve my penmanship by forcing me to write page and pages of letters. This is a decent tactic if, like you said, you want to improve your handwriting. You have to want it. You have to go slow and form the letters perfectly every time so you develop that muscle memory. I printed pages of a single letter in the font I wanted to imitate and traced the letters. It's a great acti…

[dead]

Re: Why Writing by Hand Is Better for Memory and Learning

#37

I was late to this game of "going backwards" to improve my memory and understanding of what I read and wrote. Being raised by two technologically forward engineers, we jumped on the palm-pilot/laptops/tablets/phones/e-readers bandwagon very early. 5 years ago I started turning back to calligraphy, fountain pens, and hand writing. I buy books and fill up my bookshelf. It wasn't just for the memory recall, it was the p…

Very interesting!

Is there a particular Parker model you’d recommend?

Re: Why Writing by Hand Is Better for Memory and Learning

#38
You don’t even need a fountain pen for it to feel nice, for me there are many nice needle point pens at a decent thickness 0.5+ that have a great feel to them. That and a nice Japanese paper notebook like hobonichi and the like and you’re in for a good time
Post reply on HN