Live data from Hacker News

Intuitive Machines successfully lands on the Moon

theguardian.com

21–30 of 165 posts

Re: Intuitive Machines successfully lands on the Moon

#21
post #2

Huge congratulations to IM. Landing on the Moon is extremely difficult, despite what playing KSP will condition you to think. For them to successfully land on the Moon is a huge milestone. Now to get people back there... maybe someday.

It's not even that easy in KSP!

Once you get the hang of it, it becomes pretty simple. Just keep pointed retrograde and you'll probably be fine (assuming you start your final landing burn soon enough).

Re: Intuitive Machines successfully lands on the Moon

#22
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not even that easy in KSP!

Once you get the hang of it, it becomes pretty simple. Just keep pointed retrograde and you'll probably be fine (assuming you start your final landing burn soon enough).

A KSP mod which requires you to put cameras and altimeters with failure modes on your craft would be...interesting, but probably a lot less fun.

Re: Intuitive Machines successfully lands on the Moon

#23
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's not even that easy in KSP!

Once you get the hang of it, it becomes pretty simple. Just keep pointed retrograde and you'll probably be fine (assuming you start your final landing burn soon enough).

I’ll wager once we get a handle on it it’ll be routine and simple. But it’s been quite some time since we really tried and the efforts so far again have been pretty minimal and laced with pork.

Re: Intuitive Machines successfully lands on the Moon

#24
post #2

Huge congratulations to IM. Landing on the Moon is extremely difficult, despite what playing KSP will condition you to think. For them to successfully land on the Moon is a huge milestone. Now to get people back there... maybe someday.

It's not even that easy in KSP!

It's easy enough until your fuel budget gets tight: http://moonlander.seb.ly

Re: Intuitive Machines successfully lands on the Moon

#26
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

But there is plenty of Helium 3 to mine on the Moon, to justify the cost.

Assuming we manage to build viable reactors to use it.

Helion is the closest for that, but it would be easier for them to make their own 3He by DD fusion.

It will be very hard to make 3He extraction on the moon energy positive, since it occurs at very low concentration in the regolith.

Re: Intuitive Machines successfully lands on the Moon

#27
post #13

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://www.businessinsider.com/how-india-moon-landing-cost-...

The post you're replying to is just pointing out that the quoted amount (they THEY were replying to) is missing the "million" abbreviation on the end. So it looks like the original claim was India did it for US$74.00. ;)

They are extremely resourceful people.

Re: Intuitive Machines successfully lands on the Moon

#28
post #21

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Once you get the hang of it, it becomes pretty simple. Just keep pointed retrograde and you'll probably be fine (assuming you start your final landing burn soon enough).

I’ll wager once we get a handle on it it’ll be routine and simple. But it’s been quite some time since we really tried and the efforts so far again have been pretty minimal and laced with pork.

Like that new Starbucks drink!

Re: Intuitive Machines successfully lands on the Moon

#30
post #2

Huge congratulations to IM. Landing on the Moon is extremely difficult, despite what playing KSP will condition you to think. For them to successfully land on the Moon is a huge milestone. Now to get people back there... maybe someday.

I still just cannot wrap my mind around how we could get people there, and then all this time later have lost that ability. What happened?

The best minds of our generation are working on byzantine financial derivatives, making social media more addictive, and turning fake pictures/videos/bots as realistic as possible.
Post reply on HN