And that's a sweet deal for Google, paying pennies to partially patch their deteriorating reputation about their search engine becoming useless.
Google cut a deal with Reddit for AI training data
101–110 of 154 posts
Re: Google cut a deal with Reddit for AI training data
#102Earlier quoted context omitted.
1. It is pointless to compare total company value with an annual payment. 2. It isn't an exclusive license. There are dozens of companies training language models, and if they are all forced to pay the same amount then that's some serious cash.
I thought that's really cheap too. Tacking on "wiki" and "reddit" probably accounts for ~50+% of my google searches now. From that perspective $60M annually feels really low-- reddit search is probably a quarter of the value that google search offers me as a consumer.
Re: Google cut a deal with Reddit for AI training data
#103Only $60M? Damn.. Reddit is for the streets. And that's a sweet deal for Google, paying pennies to partially patch their deteriorating reputation about their search engine becoming useless.
Re: Google cut a deal with Reddit for AI training data
#104$60 M for absolutely cutting edge dick joke generation in next gen LLMs. I question whether Reddit data is worth anything at all.
Re: Google cut a deal with Reddit for AI training data
#105I know reddit has hired a lot. This sort of feel like a fundraising round to keep operations afloat. This must be the real reason for destroying public API access.
Re: Google cut a deal with Reddit for AI training data
#106See this directive in https://www.reddit.com/robots.txt `Disallow: /r//comments////*`
But I can still search Reddit on Google. How does Google manage to get the data?
Re: Google cut a deal with Reddit for AI training data
#107$60M/year for GOOG to access all their data when they purport to be targeting a $5B valuation at IPO is really cheap. Arguably Reddit's value is it's data, and GOOG is renting it for 1.2%/year?
My usage went completely downhill and my posts/comments as well
Re: Google cut a deal with Reddit for AI training data
#108Earlier quoted context omitted.
Confidently wrong? I thought it was getting access to Reddit, not HN.
Hate on HN all you want, I’ve been without my ADHD meds (warning: the company “Done” is not technically a scam) and spending way too much time on each for the past few days, and I can say this for sure: at least people on HN pay heed to the concept of premises and careful, non-combative argument. Most responses on Reddit are “no, that’s dumb” or “yes, that reminds me of my metaphysical takes”…
Reddit is ok and quite cool for targeted discussion on targeted sub-reddits. But all the general subreddits visited by general population and everything that pops once in a while on the front page is a target for hive mind.
For HN comparison, there is a lot of "wrong" here too, but here you can find a cited academic study from one good American university that reveals most of the botfarms and fake news disseminators come from western sphere. If you try to claim on Reddit or anywhere on the internet that fake news champion is not Russia+China+whoever is evil, your entry will get buried.
Also, ask yourself who's the median redditor. For my country's national subreddit the median redditor is a high school kid from the capital.
Re: Google cut a deal with Reddit for AI training data
#109Re: Google cut a deal with Reddit for AI training data
#110Earlier quoted context omitted.
> oh cool so the contributors of the data are all getting paid? If people on reddit wanted to get paid for their opinions, they wouldn't be posting them for free on a publicly accessible forum that does not even require an account to view... This same sentiment came up when StackExchange started to use/sell StackOverflow posts for AI training too - yet everyone arguing that position failed to recognize StackExchange…
> If people on reddit wanted to get paid for their opinions, they wouldn't be posting them for free on a publicly accessible forum that does not even require an account to view... People post on the internet 'for free' with the expectation that they're discussing ideas which have their own value, not providing training data. Yeah yeah ToS blah blah blah, but the goodwill that sites have built – even ones like HN – is…