Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Pages CMS – A CMS for GitHub

pagescms.org

31–40 of 122 posts

Re: Show HN: Pages CMS – A CMS for GitHub

#31
post #15

This looks cool but I moved all my repos to a self-hosted forge when GitHub openly and notoriously refused to stop collaborating with ICE (that runs concentration camps in Texas). It would be nice to have this support generic/arbitrary git servers. I’ve been feeling this pain point for a while and have been considering building something like this myself.

I am looking into GitLab and Bitbucket, but I don't plan on supporting generic Git, unless I can find a way to slap an API in front of it. I'll add that to the backlog.

Re: Show HN: Pages CMS – A CMS for GitHub

#33

I was just thinking this morning how I wanted something like Decap CMS but a bit simpler. Got this running on Cloudflare in ten mins and it seems great so far. Thanks!

Great to hear, and glad I did not lie about it being easy to deploy.

Do get the updates I'll be pushing in the next few days as I'm sure I'll find bugs here and there (I just pushed a hotfix 5 minutes ago [1]).

[1]: https://github.com/pages-cms/pages-cms/releases/tag/0.2.1

Re: Show HN: Pages CMS – A CMS for GitHub

#36

Supremely cool. So this can supplement e.g. my eleventy sites and provide a way for clients of those sites to easily interact with the content and static asset portions of the site? Seems like there's tons of potential here. Kudos, def will give it a whirl!

Yes it does HOWEVER for now you need to log in with GitHub. I don't think it's too huge of a hassle with most people, but there is a bit of friction. I am planning to add an "invite by email" feature that will allow you to add users by entering their email address. They can then log in without a GitHub account and use it the same way you do (although the commit will be associated to a Pages CMS GitHub app).

The invite by email feature sounds great, but as you say setting up a github account for a client isn't that much friction. It's not something I'm bothered by at all, but being able to use just an email is definitely supremely more preferable.

Very exciting work.

As I'm quite enthused by the project, I hope you don't mind if I offer some hopefully helpful feedback:

- For the video on your landing page, ideally the youtube would be embedded so it doesn't open another window

- In regards to the video, while I love the content and info, it's not the most marketing friendly. It's over 2 minutes before the background of the video even changes. Ideally the video would get into the demo portion muuuch quicker.

- I clicked on this hackernews link, clicked through to your landing page, scrolled around, but really didn't get a grasp of what it was offering or how it worked or who or what it was for (admittedly I was prly lazy reading). Only after I watched the video, heard you specifically mention eleventy (which I personally use a lot) was my interest piqued enough to actually engage in the content and understand it more. Glad I did, but I gotta feel there's some better way of presenting what you're doing. I quite liked your calling it a wordpress-like CMS over top an existing static site stack.

Those are just the thoughts that came to me. I absolutely love the project, thrilled it's MIT too. Though I'm not really a javascript dev I could definitely see myself using and contributing!

Re: Show HN: Pages CMS – A CMS for GitHub

#37

why this over keystatic or statamic or (insert upcoming decap replacement)?

They all look great, but if you were pressing me for a comment:

- Keystatic: I want it to run online, not as a local app.

- Statamic: I don't want an opinionated, full-stack CMS + SSG. I want to manage content in whatever app/website I'm building whether it's Next.js, Astro, 11ty...

- Decap CMS: I mentioned it in my post, I always found Decap's UI/UX pretty lacking, and the DX wasn't that smooth either.

With that being said, each one of these projects have been around for much longer, I don't necessarily expect to compete (yet).

Re: Show HN: Pages CMS – A CMS for GitHub

#40
I've setup Decap CMS before, back when it was still called Netlify CMS. I loved the core idea of keeping all your files in Git and tracking them normally but like you said, it was just too hard get up and running and was very quirky, always thought to myself: "I wish someone would make a git based CMS like this but something that's easier to run with a less wired config / UI, seems like you did just that. Congrats!
Post reply on HN