Heroku is really great to get your started if you don't want to worry about managing infrastructure. However, you're paying a major premium for that and you need to have an exit plan from the beginning incase you grow too big and the costs no longer make sense.
Heroku's new $50 and $100 per month database plans
11–20 of 63 posts
Re: Heroku's new $50 and $100 per month database plans
#12Will be interesting to see what Heroku ends up rolling out for the higher-priced dev database (comparable to the current 20 GB plan).
Re: Heroku's new $50 and $100 per month database plans
#13Heroku is really great to get your started if you don't want to worry about managing infrastructure. However, you're paying a major premium for that and you need to have an exit plan from the beginning incase you grow too big and the costs no longer make sense.
I agree with everything you said, except that I don't think you need to spend any time working on an exit plan until the day you realize you're paying "too much" (whatever that means to you) for the benefit you're receiving from their managed hosting. I recommend: Launch on Heroku. Reevaluate that choice on success.
Re: Heroku's new $50 and $100 per month database plans
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree with everything you said, except that I don't think you need to spend any time working on an exit plan until the day you realize you're paying "too much" (whatever that means to you) for the benefit you're receiving from their managed hosting. I recommend: Launch on Heroku. Reevaluate that choice on success.
Surely designing with the eventual migration in mind will reduce the pain in the end, though.
Re: Heroku's new $50 and $100 per month database plans
#15Can we create Crane followers of a larger master database yet? That would be really useful - keeping a cheap, eventually-consistent replica around for backup and analytics.
Re: Heroku's new $50 and $100 per month database plans
#16Very cool. I've been looking at spatial databases and the fact that I could get MongoDB running on a free plan (e.g. with MongoLab and MongoHQ) made me go that way. (for now) PostGIS has been available on Heroku's dedicated DBs ( https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/is-postgis-available ), but the $200/month was a bit high for early stage. $50 is much more manageable and I might be looking towards Postgres + PostGIS…
Re: Heroku's new $50 and $100 per month database plans
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
I agree with everything you said, except that I don't think you need to spend any time working on an exit plan until the day you realize you're paying "too much" (whatever that means to you) for the benefit you're receiving from their managed hosting. I recommend: Launch on Heroku. Reevaluate that choice on success.
Surely designing with the eventual migration in mind will reduce the pain in the end, though.
What is is found an interesting product called VCider which allows you to create mini private clouds. This might be something to look into using from day one to help with eventual migration. It is free up to 8 servers.
Re: Heroku's new $50 and $100 per month database plans
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Surely designing with the eventual migration in mind will reduce the pain in the end, though.
YAGNI - your first problem is getting customers.
Heroku/EC2 are fantastic for what they are but quite pricy.
Re: Heroku's new $50 and $100 per month database plans
#19I'm building an app that will eventually use hstore for data. I say 'eventually', because I'm currently using serialized columns on the $15/month shared plan, and hstore is not yet supported.
At $50/month, this is cheap enough for me to use as a staging server or as a pre-release server to get hstore across my entire environment.
Re: Heroku's new $50 and $100 per month database plans
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Surely designing with the eventual migration in mind will reduce the pain in the end, though.
YAGNI - your first problem is getting customers.