Earlier quoted context omitted.
Generally speaking you can't just admit to jury nullification without potentially undoing the nullifcation. All you can really do is say "not guilty". If you want to find jury nullification you have to find cases where the evidence is overwhelmingly in favor of conviction but the jury didn't convict anyway. And that can be hard to say, since outside of the court you often don't know exactly what the jury saw and the…
So if jurors admit that they changed their verdict because they disagreed with the law, does that cause a mistrial?
Court blocks $1B copyright ruling that punished ISP for its users' piracy
81–90 of 93 posts
Re: Court blocks $1B copyright ruling that punished ISP for its users' piracy
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
You'd think ISPs would do their darnedest to make it so they don't have a way of knowing what content is flowing over their pipes, to help avoid accusations of contributory infringement. My understanding is that ISP don't want to be seen as dumb pipes, despite that it would probably absolve them of a lot of responsibility and liability, because dumb pipes are effectively a commodity and thus a race to the bottom pric…
Ironically I would probably pay more for a dumber, but more reliable pipe. My operator changed my modem, and its configuration is "easier than ever!" (says the manual). That is, you have to use your account page on their website to change the wifi settings, and the more advanced part of it you must install an app on your phone. But you can't specify a custom DNS (which I'm sure the default router firmware would let y…
Their website even has clear documentation (in Dutch) with all the configuration details in case you want to set up your own fibre-optics modem, and the details on the VLAN to use for internet and telephony over it[2].
I use the ISP-supplied fibre modem plugged into an OpenWrt router. The router itself does PPPoE via VLAN. I hope you can get your ISP to follow such an example.
[1]: https://fsfe.org/news/2020/news-20200601-01.en.html [2]: https://www.kpn.com/service/eigen-apparatuur
Re: Court blocks $1B copyright ruling that punished ISP for its users' piracy
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
Possible, but more likely the landlord (or new owner) realized that if you can switch to tenant-billed even with a rent drop, you have a more valuable property overall - if most of the apartments in the area are tenant-billed.
True, rent prices are typically the most important figure for any property. Everything else comes secondary - if you're halfway down the search results because of your prices, almost nobody will even see that utilities are included.
Re: Court blocks $1B copyright ruling that punished ISP for its users' piracy
#84Re: Court blocks $1B copyright ruling that punished ISP for its users' piracy
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ironically I would probably pay more for a dumber, but more reliable pipe. My operator changed my modem, and its configuration is "easier than ever!" (says the manual). That is, you have to use your account page on their website to change the wifi settings, and the more advanced part of it you must install an app on your phone. But you can't specify a custom DNS (which I'm sure the default router firmware would let y…
> you must install an app on your phone I _love_ those. When I'm trying to configure my modem, nothing gets my nether regions tingly faster than (1) Visiting the documented configuration site on the back of the modem (2) It 404s in a new and excitingly different way from every other modem you've owned (3) After visiting a nearby business with working internet, the helpful interblags populace suggests you need an app,…
Re: Court blocks $1B copyright ruling that punished ISP for its users' piracy
#86Wow, a case between an ISP cartel member and a copyright cartel member. Hard to pick one to root for. Somehow neither side managed to make the other side look like the good guy. You'd think ISPs would do their darnedest to make it so they don't have a way of knowing what content is flowing over their pipes, to help avoid accusations of contributory infringement. ALSO: The photo of an Internet Pirate is amazing.
Re: Court blocks $1B copyright ruling that punished ISP for its users' piracy
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
There is a valuable lesson there for whatever fool wrote the contract. Don't promise someone uncapped use of something like that for a fixed price. Especially not electricity.
In the province I live in, the government writes the rental contract. Individuals and businesses aren't allowed to write it.
Re: Court blocks $1B copyright ruling that punished ISP for its users' piracy
#88Earlier quoted context omitted.
Nah. The ISP is the actual medium whose network was used to copy the alleged infringing content. So that's not analogous to all the utilities in use by the infringer.
I think the key differentiator is that Cox [somehow] knew that the customer was using their network to copy the alleged infringing content. The electric company doesn't know this, and (to use another example) the hard drive manufacturer doesn't know that their customer is storing the content on the drives the make. If I were Cox, I suppose I would be incentivized to operate kind of like a VPN and just not store logs…
This is completely true, and yet many many countries place a fee on any writable media (drives, cards, disks) and funnel that bribe directly to the RIAA and MPAA by law. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_copying_levy
Re: Court blocks $1B copyright ruling that punished ISP for its users' piracy
#89Earlier quoted context omitted.
> you must install an app on your phone I _love_ those. When I'm trying to configure my modem, nothing gets my nether regions tingly faster than (1) Visiting the documented configuration site on the back of the modem (2) It 404s in a new and excitingly different way from every other modem you've owned (3) After visiting a nearby business with working internet, the helpful interblags populace suggests you need an app,…
Is there a reason your phone doesn't have data services in this example?
- The modem in question is in the lower floors of a skyscraper. Nobody has good service. Incidentally, till wifi texting and calling became popular, that made forced SMS 2FA way more annoying than it already was -- run outside to catch a bar of service, try to get back to your apartment before the 2FA code expires.
- The modem in question is in the middle of nowhere (or some approximation thereof, like an hour or two out of Laramie WY). You technically have 50 kilobits per second of download throughput, but that's painful when the modem configuration app is 28 megabytes. It doesn't help that modern sites clock in at megabytes, and most of your software and hardware nowadays assumes anything over 10 seconds to a minute or so per request is a failure and times it out, making browsing some sites _literally_ impossible rather than just slow.
- You recently meddled with your APN settings and tweaked the one field that makes your phone helpfully decide to not display that APN entry, and it coincidentally means you don't have data service. Not having memorized 20 random ports and uris and stringly typed feature flags, you can't fix it without outside help.
- Your cell provider decided to increase your rates without notice when the contract renewed. You don't like being surprised by that sort of thing and had a spending cap on the card to prevent it, but you were instead surprised by a lack of cell service.
- Your cell provider's autopay functionality is broken the one day that year you needed it to work (friend's experience, not mine).
- Your cell provider had a bug double-counting data usage the one month you planned to get near the limit. Without internet you can't connect to their customer support to get that fixed (to their credit, customer support was fast and hassle-free).
- You're pinching pennies to get through college. You only have a phone because your bank won't let you in without SMS 2FA. It's only a smartphone because the cheapest of those are cheaper than the cheapest dumb phones nowadays (and you bought it used anyway). You don't have a data plan because that's an extravagent and unnecessary expense. (Why are you buying internet in this event? No clue, but it's another reason somebody might not have cell data, and I'm sure amongst the 3M people in the US with smartphones without a data plan some of them have self-consistent reasons for getting internet at home).
And so on. Any given day, lots of people have smartphones without data.
Re: Court blocks $1B copyright ruling that punished ISP for its users' piracy
#90Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ironically I would probably pay more for a dumber, but more reliable pipe. My operator changed my modem, and its configuration is "easier than ever!" (says the manual). That is, you have to use your account page on their website to change the wifi settings, and the more advanced part of it you must install an app on your phone. But you can't specify a custom DNS (which I'm sure the default router firmware would let y…
> you must install an app on your phone I _love_ those. When I'm trying to configure my modem, nothing gets my nether regions tingly faster than (1) Visiting the documented configuration site on the back of the modem (2) It 404s in a new and excitingly different way from every other modem you've owned (3) After visiting a nearby business with working internet, the helpful interblags populace suggests you need an app,…