They did the same accidentally to the co-founder https://twitter.com/defunkt/status/1754610843361362360 Once I'd seen that, I doubled down on my self hosted GitLab and never looked back. GitHub can be a mirror for public good, but it's no castle I want to be a prisoner of.
GitHub bans organizations without warning or explanation
51–60 of 66 posts
Re: GitHub bans organizations without warning or explanation
#52I recently encountered this with Apple (https://skogsbrus.xyz/dont-put-all-your-apples-in-one-basket...). After 2 months I'm still fighting them to recover some of my devices.
Re: GitHub bans organizations without warning or explanation
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
As far as I'm concerned, the first platform to get federated merge requests will win it all.
Merge requests are already federated on any platform using Git, just email an author.
Re: GitHub bans organizations without warning or explanation
#54Automated account suspension is anti-consumerist for the % of false positives. And since that % likely is low, companies get away with ridiculous processes for recovering your account. I recently encountered this with Apple ( https://skogsbrus.xyz/dont-put-all-your-apples-in-one-basket... ). After 2 months I'm still fighting them to recover some of my devices.
Re: GitHub bans organizations without warning or explanation
#55I've used GitHub for years knowing that Microsoft owning it, they're headed for a place I won't like. I just haven't experienced that until now. I've been trying out sr.ht and codeberg.org. Sadly the product is nowhere near GitHub.
I just installed gitea and never looked back. Lightweight, does all I need and full control. Microsoft killing the place was very foreseeable
https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-1918...
I don't think that a modern git web front-end needs to either look ugly and lack basic features, or be a security vulnerability, or be run by a gigantic corporation.
It just happens that you can only choose between those right now.
I really wish there were something as nice as GitHub, self-hosted, with a better security model.
Re: GitHub bans organizations without warning or explanation
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
Merge requests are already federated on any platform using Git, just email an author.
Email is federated, but I don't see how that means "any platform using Git" now has federated merge requests?
Merging your patch even comes built-in with Git. The place hosting your Git repo doesn't need anything special to support this. You email the author, they merge your patch and then git push.
Re: GitHub bans organizations without warning or explanation
#57Update: After HN post, GitHub emailed me instantly telling me their algorithm mistakenly banned me and they can’t tell me why or which organizations were affected.
Re: GitHub bans organizations without warning or explanation
#58I've used GitHub for years knowing that Microsoft owning it, they're headed for a place I won't like. I just haven't experienced that until now. I've been trying out sr.ht and codeberg.org. Sadly the product is nowhere near GitHub.
Re: GitHub bans organizations without warning or explanation
#59They did the same accidentally to the co-founder https://twitter.com/defunkt/status/1754610843361362360 Once I'd seen that, I doubled down on my self hosted GitLab and never looked back. GitHub can be a mirror for public good, but it's no castle I want to be a prisoner of.
Re: GitHub bans organizations without warning or explanation
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
Email is federated, but I don't see how that means "any platform using Git" now has federated merge requests?
You email the author, the author can merge your patch or pull from your repo/branch. Merging your patch even comes built-in with Git. The place hosting your Git repo doesn't need anything special to support this. You email the author, they merge your patch and then git push.