Earlier quoted context omitted.
Colorado’s HB1229 became law, and several other states have pending consumer lending legislation capping rates at 25%. You can’t fix humans (especially when they’re forced to exist in this dystopian economic system), but you can reduce the exploitation with legislation. Even adults need protection, depending on circumstances, and their status as an adult isn’t a free pass to harm. But heh, that’s just the law. We can…
> Even adults need protection, depending on circumstances I think the argument is that it's not protection. If someone won't lend to you at 25% (but they would at 27%), then you can't borrow. Is it protection to just prevent those people from borrowing at all?
But a lot of people just straight up don't understand interest (despite it being within their capabilities) and e.g. make minimum payments on their loans and complain when the balance goes up. A particularly egregious case (because the people in question are educated) is when people make minimum payments on student loans and don't seem to understand why the balance is increasing.