101–107 of 107 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why does any app have to "own" the database? I don't see this as being a restriction any more than it is with Markdown. Arguably even less so with a database since you have access to transactions.
If you made a new app what is "the" database you would write to? There isn't an existing standard for this aside from the file system.
I tried llama-2-7b-chat.Q4_K_M.gguf and phi-2.Q4_K_M.gguf and neither showed any knowledge of the notes I added to the folder.
Does anyone know of a good way to test if it's working (a prompt?) and does anyone know of other projects like this?
I really like this idea and the app, but beware when using your existing logseq folder it will mess up the structure/indentation/bullet-points of the notes.
Is this really fully open source? What is the catch / what is the proprietary part?
Could I share an idea(note) with a friend? And we grow the idea together?
It doesn't seem to view my plain text notes. What file formats are currently supported, if plain text is not?
This is a good reminder of why storing Obsidian notes as individual Markdown files is much more useful than stuffing those notes in a database and having Markdown as an export format. The direct manipulation of files allows multiple apps to coexist and do useful things on top of the same files.
That was the reason why I gave up Joplin very quickly. The last Joplin thread, here on Hacker News, has also shown once again that some still do not understand why "But Joplin can export Markdown from the database!" is not the same as simple, flat Markdown files.