Interesting. I want to seamlessly distribute my music through bittorrent, but since I have a small fan base (and thus, a very small potential seeding pool), I found it difficult to connect all the moving parts. I'll give Bitmagnet a try for an Indexer. I did find that IPFS, with a pinning service (I won't shill the one I used in particular), was a bit easier and just worked for everyone who tried to use it. But I'd l…
Bitmagnet Allows People to Run Their Own Decentralized Torrent Indexer Locally
61–70 of 103 posts
Re: Bitmagnet Allows People to Run Their Own Decentralized Torrent Indexer Locally
#62Who remembers Skytorrents ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13423629 )? Posted as a "Show HN" here, it was a DHT-sourced index and stack written in C with no JavaScript, no cookies, no ads, no tracking. Skytorrents was unbelievably fast, friendly, and complete, and this translated into rapid adoption and traffic growth that caused the site to shut down due to server costs after just a year ( https://torrentfreak…
Re: Bitmagnet Allows People to Run Their Own Decentralized Torrent Indexer Locally
#63"Unlike well-moderated torrent sites, Bitmagnet adds almost any torrent it finds to its database. This includes mislabeled files, malware-ridden releases, and potentially illegal content. The software tries to limit abuse by filtering metadata for CSAM content, however." This is by far the biggest hurdle to something like this. You'll eventually have to end up again with a centralized curator.
they shouldn’t do anything aside from a disclaimer just opt out of being an arbiter, like public utilities do
Re: Bitmagnet Allows People to Run Their Own Decentralized Torrent Indexer Locally
#64Who remembers Skytorrents ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13423629 )? Posted as a "Show HN" here, it was a DHT-sourced index and stack written in C with no JavaScript, no cookies, no ads, no tracking. Skytorrents was unbelievably fast, friendly, and complete, and this translated into rapid adoption and traffic growth that caused the site to shut down due to server costs after just a year ( https://torrentfreak…
I feel like writing a fast torrent tracker isn't particularly hard. The hard part is the legal risk.
Re: Bitmagnet Allows People to Run Their Own Decentralized Torrent Indexer Locally
#65Re: Bitmagnet Allows People to Run Their Own Decentralized Torrent Indexer Locally
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
they shouldn’t do anything aside from a disclaimer just opt out of being an arbiter, like public utilities do
Things like this need good signal to noise ratio to survive. Just throwing your hands in the air and saying anything goes doesn't work because users don't want to search through 10 billion mislabelled things to find the right one.
Re: Bitmagnet Allows People to Run Their Own Decentralized Torrent Indexer Locally
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
Or connect with trusted curators over a decentralized network, similar to the fediverse?
Or a baked-in a use-based rating system. That would be cool if it could be protected from abuse.
Nothing is new under the sun since the internet was created, these are the same problems that email has tried and failed to solve for 50 years.
Re: Bitmagnet Allows People to Run Their Own Decentralized Torrent Indexer Locally
#68Earlier quoted context omitted.
Have you considered setting up a web seed? https://www.ubuntubuzz.com/2021/06/how-to-add-web-seeds-to-t...
No I hadn't! This seems exciting. Have you done it successfully?
Re: Bitmagnet Allows People to Run Their Own Decentralized Torrent Indexer Locally
#69Re: Bitmagnet Allows People to Run Their Own Decentralized Torrent Indexer Locally
#70"Unlike well-moderated torrent sites, Bitmagnet adds almost any torrent it finds to its database. This includes mislabeled files, malware-ridden releases, and potentially illegal content. The software tries to limit abuse by filtering metadata for CSAM content, however." This is by far the biggest hurdle to something like this. You'll eventually have to end up again with a centralized curator.