My sixth year as a bootstrapped founder
11–20 of 339 posts
Re: My sixth year as a bootstrapped founder
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
in what sense is it getting worse? While there may be local minima, I'd argue that its the best its ever been. News has always been pessimistic because negative emotions are easier to trigger to drive attention which pays the bills.
Re: My sixth year as a bootstrapped founder
#13Really interesting to see that adding a metal box and making the product more premium made a huge impact on revenue. Have you run any pricing experiments after that?
Re: My sixth year as a bootstrapped founder
#14Author here. As always, I'm happy to take any feedback or answer any questions about this post.
Re: My sixth year as a bootstrapped founder
#15Re: My sixth year as a bootstrapped founder
#16Re: My sixth year as a bootstrapped founder
#17Author here. As always, I'm happy to take any feedback or answer any questions about this post.
Good luck in year #7!
Re: My sixth year as a bootstrapped founder
#18I am thinking of going down the same path. Which tools do you use for sales and marketing?
Re: My sixth year as a bootstrapped founder
#19i wonder if with sales increasing in spite of the 10% price increase, he could increase it even more. personally i would rather have less fulfilment and a higher profit margin if possible
Re: My sixth year as a bootstrapped founder
#20That's very cool, Michael. Really great to see your business doing well, congrats! Really interesting to see that adding a metal box and making the product more premium made a huge impact on revenue. Have you run any pricing experiments after that?
>Have you run any pricing experiments after that?
No, I haven't tinkered with the price much for the past few months.
I have a hard time doing price experiments because at my volumes, I have to collect a few weeks of data before I think the evidence is strong, and I don't have a good way to A/B test different prices in parallel, so it's easy for two different time periods to have different results independent of price.
I've also found that there's a lot of friction around changing prices too frequently. When I reduce prices by a significant amount, we get emails for a couple of weeks after from people who are annoyed they paid a higher price just before a reduction, so I've been reticent to invite those complaints.
I don't have strong evidence for it, but $399 for base and $499 for premium "feels" right because they're round numbers and they're close to optimal based on different prices we've tried.