Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google
21–30 of 379 posts
Re: Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google
#22It seems deeply overvalued to me, as it's pretty likely that NVIDIA's competitors will have parallel computation hardware that competes well enough. I'm personally not a fan of NVIDIA's drivers or the reliability of their hardware.
> I'm personally not a fan of NVIDIA's drivers or the reliability of their hardware. As compared to AMD or Intel? I wish there was real competition to Nvidia but there isn't. I'm not a fan of their defacto monopoly but they do have the best product on the market and their competition has been asleep for 10 years. AMD and Intel barely knew what deep learning was 10 years ago (and certainly did not appreciate the oppor…
that sounds very interesting, can you link/share/describe some details on it? how much did they invest? how? into CUDA? what else?
Re: Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google
#23Somehow I wish it weren't true because I hate monopolies in any markets. Nvidia has been enjoying their absurd premium on consumer and production GPUs and intentionally removed the NVLink capability in the GeForce 4090 series (3090 had them) to avoid cannibalizing their A100 and H100 business. With NVLink, people could chain multiple GPUs and increase the overall VRAM without much reduction in bandwidth. But without…
But the only reason you're mad at Nvidia is because they made something desirable (a GPU that does NN training) but didn't do it in the way you prefer (NVLink, Linux compatibility etc).
It's not their fault AMD and others have been asleep at the wheel and handed them the whole market for free. Any company with a monopoly on the hot new thing would try to capitalize on it.
When the other GPU makers eventually catch a wakeup, the situation will finally improve.
Re: Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google
#24Insanity. How much of their success/future hinges on TSMC's continued success/future? Kudos to them but the risk makes me uneasy.
Re: Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google
#25And with a P/E ratio of 95, versus 25 and 59 for Google and Amazon, respectively!
Re: Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not having done any GPU programming...is most of the code out there tied to the Nvidia architecture? I mean, if AMD or somebody else builds a better mousetrap, how much work would it be to switch?
Most of the AI and ML related programming uses frameworks that abstract away what brand of GPU you are using. They could care less whether it is nvidia or AMD.
Re: Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google
#27Re: Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google
#28Somehow I wish it weren't true because I hate monopolies in any markets. Nvidia has been enjoying their absurd premium on consumer and production GPUs and intentionally removed the NVLink capability in the GeForce 4090 series (3090 had them) to avoid cannibalizing their A100 and H100 business. With NVLink, people could chain multiple GPUs and increase the overall VRAM without much reduction in bandwidth. But without…
I understand the sentiment. But the only reason you're mad at Nvidia is because they made something desirable (a GPU that does NN training) but didn't do it in the way you prefer (NVLink, Linux compatibility etc). It's not their fault AMD and others have been asleep at the wheel and handed them the whole market for free. Any company with a monopoly on the hot new thing would try to capitalize on it. When the other GP…
Re: Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google
#29It seems deeply overvalued to me, as it's pretty likely that NVIDIA's competitors will have parallel computation hardware that competes well enough. I'm personally not a fan of NVIDIA's drivers or the reliability of their hardware.
Re: Nvidia is now more valuable than Amazon and Google
#30However, their PE ratio is currently 93. This is the kind of PE growth investors buy at, hoping for geometric earnings growth to kick in, not the situation after such growth has taken place.
Which means they'll have to keep 2x-ing that profit for a long time to come.
It could be doable but I don't see it. Even if they completely absorb Intel and AMD's market share, it doesn't make sense.