Live data from Hacker News

Facebook Stops You From Posting ‘Irrelevant Or Inappropriate’ Comments

techcrunch.com

1–10 of 75 posts

Re: Facebook Stops You From Posting ‘Irrelevant Or Inappropriate’ Comments

#2
Based on the anecdotal comments below the original post, it seems like there's a very high correlation between posts that get flagged as inappropriate by Facebook and those that mention Google+ or link to it. Which seems absurd, on the face of it, but I am going to have to experiment.

Re: Facebook Stops You From Posting ‘Irrelevant Or Inappropriate’ Comments

#3
This is a great example of machine learning gone wrong. Facebook turns the knob on their "positivity" algorithm a little too far to the right.

Machine learning is one of this things that works great until it doesn't, and you get misguided decisions like this that had zero human involvement.

Re: Facebook Stops You From Posting ‘Irrelevant Or Inappropriate’ Comments

#5

Based on the anecdotal comments below the original post, it seems like there's a very high correlation between posts that get flagged as inappropriate by Facebook and those that mention Google+ or link to it. Which seems absurd, on the face of it, but I am going to have to experiment.

I haven't been able to make the dialog show, even by copying the full text of the comment which was originally flagged. Maybe they dialed it back?

Re: Facebook Stops You From Posting ‘Irrelevant Or Inappropriate’ Comments

#6
This is an isolated incident. "Irrelevant or Inappropriate" sounds like a euphemism for spam- if Facebook is fighting comment spam then I applaud them. Their algorithm just isn't quite right yet. No story here.

"Is this censorship?" Are false positives on a spam filter censorship?

Re: Facebook Stops You From Posting ‘Irrelevant Or Inappropriate’ Comments

#9
post #6

This is an isolated incident. "Irrelevant or Inappropriate" sounds like a euphemism for spam- if Facebook is fighting comment spam then I applaud them. Their algorithm just isn't quite right yet. No story here. "Is this censorship?" Are false positives on a spam filter censorship?

It's exactly this. Let's not forget the quality of techcrunch comments improved by an order of magnitude as soon as they switched to Facebook's comment system, which has the best spam/troll detection I've ever seen. A tiny number of false positives is a fair price in my mind.
Post reply on HN