Vert.x – JVM Polyglot Alternative to Node.js
1–10 of 83 posts
Re: Vert.x – JVM Polyglot Alternative to Node.js
#2So it's more like Twisted (a library) than Node (a runtime + a library).
Re: Vert.x – JVM Polyglot Alternative to Node.js
#3also look at http://ringojs.org
Re: Vert.x – JVM Polyglot Alternative to Node.js
#4Trying to install this on Ubuntu. Is it me or is the "binary" download link [1] not really a binary download link?
Re: Vert.x – JVM Polyglot Alternative to Node.js
#5[deleted]
Re: Vert.x – JVM Polyglot Alternative to Node.js
#6The install pre-requisites recommends that Windows users install a linux VM - but I found the beta 11 version works directly.
Re: Vert.x – JVM Polyglot Alternative to Node.js
#7i wonder how is it compared to servlet container (e.g. tomcay and servlet spec?
Re: Vert.x – JVM Polyglot Alternative to Node.js
#8Impressive. It's basically a kinda-sorta-rewrite of Node.js APIs on the JVM.
Looking through the docs, the main difference I see is that this is opting for a comparatively heavy-core approach which contrasts with Node's ruthless minimalism + third-party modules.
For example:
-file system access is convoluted with HTTP handling: req.response.sendFile()
-pieces of web framework functionality by default, but no full solution (RouteMatcher)
-integrated WebSockets with a novel but unconventional accept/reject API
-heavyweight SockJS integration
It will be interesting how all of his plays out. And I'm definitely interested in hearing evidence for claims such as
> a run-time with real concurrency and unrivalled performance
Re: Vert.x – JVM Polyglot Alternative to Node.js
#9i wonder how is it compared to servlet container (e.g. tomcay and servlet spec?
it ignores those, for good reason