Threads now reaches more than 130M monthly users, up 30M from Q3
1–10 of 61 posts
Re: Threads now reaches more than 130M monthly users, up 30M from Q3
#2[flagged]
Re: Threads now reaches more than 130M monthly users, up 30M from Q3
#3It’s gotta be the in-feed Threads carousels in Instagram, I have to give Meta credit, that’s a great way to get people into the threads app. I’m also finding more of the people I liked from Twitter on Threads now. It’s nice to have that corner of the internet back again.
Re: Threads now reaches more than 130M monthly users, up 30M from Q3
#4What are all those people doing? Because I sure don't see that kind of activity in the engagement metrics. Very few posts get thousands of likes, most languish in the double digits.
Re: Threads now reaches more than 130M monthly users, up 30M from Q3
#5[flagged]
[deleted]
Re: Threads now reaches more than 130M monthly users, up 30M from Q3
#6I forget completely about Threads, until about every 3 months when an article about it pops up on HN.
I don’t know where these 30M users are, but none of them are anybody in my work/family/friends circle.
And very little chatter about it here on HN either.
I know literally zero people using it, or at the very least talking about using it or sharing stories from it.
Re: Threads now reaches more than 130M monthly users, up 30M from Q3
#7[flagged]
Election denialism isn't new here, it's a healthy tenet of a functioning democracy. The Republicans did it in '20, the democrats did it in' 16, the democrats did it in '00. The people need the freedom to question an election's legitimacy in order to trust the results. Banning dissent will demolish trust in fair elections, not increase it.
Re: Threads now reaches more than 130M monthly users, up 30M from Q3
#8Hank Green tried cross-posting content to his Threads and Twitter accounts and found similar levels of engagement (replies and likes) on both platforms.
Re: Threads now reaches more than 130M monthly users, up 30M from Q3
#9[dead]
Re: Threads now reaches more than 130M monthly users, up 30M from Q3
#10[flagged]
Election denialism isn't new here, it's a healthy tenet of a functioning democracy. The Republicans did it in '20, the democrats did it in' 16, the democrats did it in '00. The people need the freedom to question an election's legitimacy in order to trust the results. Banning dissent will demolish trust in fair elections, not increase it.
[flagged]