Earlier quoted context omitted.
> a clear attempt at Adobe trying to buyout their competition because they can't seem to compete. You paint this like it's a bad thing, that's why many acquisitions occur.
> You paint this like it's a bad thing, that's why many acquisitions occur. You paint that like it's a good thing.
Adobe gives up on web-design product to rival Figma after deal collapse
31–40 of 233 posts
Re: Adobe gives up on web-design product to rival Figma after deal collapse
#32Adobe XD was meant to take on Sketch, and failed at that, which meant it was fully two generations behind Figma. They couldn't compete, and as a company they have no capacity for making innovative web design products. They do seem to have a capacity for ruining the ones they buy, so I'm glad this attempt failed.
Re: Adobe gives up on web-design product to rival Figma after deal collapse
#33Now Figma can become the de-facto choice for its software category and a merger was proved to be ultimately unnecessary for its survival and was a clear attempt at Adobe trying to buyout their competition because they can't seem to compete. I think overall this is a good thing. Adobe owning Figma isn't a great promise that it would be make Figma better, improve Figma in any way, nor keep Figma on the path of making h…
> a clear attempt at Adobe trying to buyout their competition because they can't seem to compete. You paint this like it's a bad thing, that's why many acquisitions occur.
The second part of your sentence does not justify the first. Just because something happens a lot does not make it good.
Re: Adobe gives up on web-design product to rival Figma after deal collapse
#34Earlier quoted context omitted.
> You paint this like it's a bad thing, that's why many acquisitions occur. You paint that like it's a good thing.
A lot of founders see it as a good thing -- not everyone wants to stay in the game. Some want a big liquidity event after 10 years of grind and a sale to a large competing company typically yields the biggest windfall.
Yes, for themselves. But I doubt anyone on this current thread is a Figma founder, meaning we’re discussing if it’s a good or bad thing for users.
Re: Adobe gives up on web-design product to rival Figma after deal collapse
#35Earlier quoted context omitted.
A lot of founders see it as a good thing -- not everyone wants to stay in the game. Some want a big liquidity event after 10 years of grind and a sale to a large competing company typically yields the biggest windfall.
> A lot of founders see it as a good thing Yes, for themselves. But I doubt anyone on this current thread is a Figma founder, meaning we’re discussing if it’s a good or bad thing for users.
Re: Adobe gives up on web-design product to rival Figma after deal collapse
#36Now Figma can become the de-facto choice for its software category and a merger was proved to be ultimately unnecessary for its survival and was a clear attempt at Adobe trying to buyout their competition because they can't seem to compete. I think overall this is a good thing. Adobe owning Figma isn't a great promise that it would be make Figma better, improve Figma in any way, nor keep Figma on the path of making h…
We recognize Adobe XD as incapable, but with Adobe's resources, they'd have thrown enough money until they achieved it.
Of course there are exceptions: same cannot be said of Google Video and YouTube.
Re: Adobe gives up on web-design product to rival Figma after deal collapse
#37Now Figma can become the de-facto choice for its software category and a merger was proved to be ultimately unnecessary for its survival and was a clear attempt at Adobe trying to buyout their competition because they can't seem to compete. I think overall this is a good thing. Adobe owning Figma isn't a great promise that it would be make Figma better, improve Figma in any way, nor keep Figma on the path of making h…
Re: Adobe gives up on web-design product to rival Figma after deal collapse
#38Adobe XD was meant to take on Sketch, and failed at that, which meant it was fully two generations behind Figma. They couldn't compete, and as a company they have no capacity for making innovative web design products. They do seem to have a capacity for ruining the ones they buy, so I'm glad this attempt failed.
In that time between XD's inception and Figma's buyout attempt, hasn't Sketch caught up to Figma and become a decent competitor to it? I haven't used it in a while because my employer doesn't support it and my freelance work has effectively ended.
Re: Adobe gives up on web-design product to rival Figma after deal collapse
#39Re: Adobe gives up on web-design product to rival Figma after deal collapse
#40Figma is optimized for invoicing & silos.
I know these are fightin words for some, but I've personally never seen Figma be a good thing for product goals or the whole team.