The disastrous communication from Apple to apps developers
1–10 of 62 posts
Re: The disastrous communication from Apple to apps developers
#2If you publish a popular app via an alternative app store and don't pay Apple, Apple can still block/remove your app?
Then what is the point of alternative app stores? I thought it's about who controls which apps get blocked and which get onto the phone?
Re: The disastrous communication from Apple to apps developers
#3(It’s per year, not per month.)
Re: The disastrous communication from Apple to apps developers
#4> the developer will have to pay 0.50$ per download and each month to Apple. (It’s per year, not per month.)
Re: The disastrous communication from Apple to apps developers
#5I don't understand the situation. If you publish a popular app via an alternative app store and don't pay Apple, Apple can still block/remove your app? Then what is the point of alternative app stores? I thought it's about who controls which apps get blocked and which get onto the phone?
They cannot overtly say they are not going to do what they were told to.
Re: The disastrous communication from Apple to apps developers
#6Re: The disastrous communication from Apple to apps developers
#7Re: The disastrous communication from Apple to apps developers
#8I kinda still don't see the problem. If you don't like it make your own phone.
A better option is "use Android", which already does support multiple stores.
Re: The disastrous communication from Apple to apps developers
#9I kinda still don't see the problem. If you don't like it make your own phone.
Re: The disastrous communication from Apple to apps developers
#10I kinda still don't see the problem. If you don't like it make your own phone.