I created the ClearHealth/HealthCloud open source (GPL) EMR which to my knowledge is the only open source one to receive full federal certification. Operations (not surgery) are so incredibly bad / incompetent in most healthcare settings that software frequently gets the blame for much deeper problems. This article is a doctors perspective on how software did not fix a completely broken workflow. I don't begrudge him…
Everyone hates the electronic medical record
51–60 of 343 posts
Re: Everyone hates the electronic medical record
#52I wrote a thesis on EHR's 7 years ago. They really haven't seemed to improve much. I personally think a big part of the issue is actually scope, these systems are expected to do everything - medical notes, script ordering, appointment management, billing of course, and 3000 other things. This weirdly leads to a distribution problem, you can't be a serious competitor in just one area, you have to do everything. Only t…
Is this something where a public competitor might help? It surely can't be worse than private industry.
Re: Everyone hates the electronic medical record
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this something where a public competitor might help? It surely can't be worse than private industry.
The UK government tried this, wasted 12.4 billion pounds over 10 years, and ultimately wrote most the project off. The dream of an EHR is just deceptively tricky, so many smart, well-funded, well-connected teams have tried and failed. ref: https://barnett.surge.sh/welcome/intro.html
Re: Everyone hates the electronic medical record
#54Lots of smaller doctor offices complained though. Only the bigger ones offer it.
Re: Everyone hates the electronic medical record
#55Disclaimer: Worked at Epic for > 3 years. EHR’s have all the problems of enterprise software, plus some. At the end of the day, the software is made for the people who pay for it. This isn’t the patients, or the providers. It’s the admin, billing, and bureaucracy layer who get to make all the decisions. It’s not surprising that these people don’t prioritize good software. EMR’s need to do more, but the root of the pr…
There’s a whole industry of tools to help you build better interfaces on top of these big systems of records to improve the user experience. So much so that Gartner has even describes it as a desired way of designing system: used to be Pace Layer model, now it’s called Composable Enterprise.
Re: Everyone hates the electronic medical record
#56Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this something where a public competitor might help? It surely can't be worse than private industry.
The UK government tried this, wasted 12.4 billion pounds over 10 years, and ultimately wrote most the project off. The dream of an EHR is just deceptively tricky, so many smart, well-funded, well-connected teams have tried and failed. ref: https://barnett.surge.sh/welcome/intro.html
Of course, this does demand citizens give a shit, which seems hopeless at this point.
Re: Everyone hates the electronic medical record
#57Re: Everyone hates the electronic medical record
#58I created the ClearHealth/HealthCloud open source (GPL) EMR which to my knowledge is the only open source one to receive full federal certification. Operations (not surgery) are so incredibly bad / incompetent in most healthcare settings that software frequently gets the blame for much deeper problems. This article is a doctors perspective on how software did not fix a completely broken workflow. I don't begrudge him…
Re: Everyone hates the electronic medical record
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this something where a public competitor might help? It surely can't be worse than private industry.
Is there any industry in which public competitor is better than private one?
Re: Everyone hates the electronic medical record
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is this something where a public competitor might help? It surely can't be worse than private industry.
Oh it could be much worse. You should see how bad government run HIE’s are.