Live data from Hacker News

A company that sells lost airplane luggage

thehustle.co

41–50 of 141 posts

Re: A company that sells lost airplane luggage

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If they didn't exist, the headline would be "The company that dumps your lost airplane luggage into a landfill."

sounds good to me. Then nobody's making money off of stolen goods except the landfill.

So you want to buy stuff that the landfill owner sells?

Re: A company that sells lost airplane luggage

#42
post #34
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Please read the article...

I did. Are you saying 25m bags have absolutely no information on them? Absolutely zero?

I read the article as well, as there is no info on this at all. After some searching I did find the information in a different article about Canadian airlines:

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/what-happens-to-unclaimed-lug...

Air Canada and Westjet both open the bags to look for identifying information so they can contact the owner. Then they donate the bags to charity or dispose of them if they can't locate the owner.

I think the moral of the story is to make sure your bag is well tagged. We have been putting an airtag in my bag for the last few flights, and it works really well. It's a pity there is no Android equivalent, as I have no way of locating my tags on my phone. (I just use an ipad).

Re: A company that sells lost airplane luggage

#43
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I did. Are you saying 25m bags have absolutely no information on them? Absolutely zero?

Did you read the sentence right after that one? "Around 25m of them (5.7 per 1k bags checked) end up lost or misdirected. The 0.03% of bags that are still not reunited with their owners after 90 days are sold by the airline." 0.03% of 25m, and it's only after 90 days.

But it doesn't explain why they can't use the tags to locate the owners. I did find the answer (see my other comment), but it wasn't from this article.

Re: A company that sells lost airplane luggage

#44
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I did. Are you saying 25m bags have absolutely no information on them? Absolutely zero?

Did you read the sentence right after that one? "Around 25m of them (5.7 per 1k bags checked) end up lost or misdirected. The 0.03% of bags that are still not reunited with their owners after 90 days are sold by the airline." 0.03% of 25m, and it's only after 90 days.

Yes, although that doesn't seem correct. That would be 7500 a year.

When they say the founder was buying 3k a month, either the RF ids are great at reducing the losses worldwide, or something is wrong with those numbers.

Re: A company that sells lost airplane luggage

#45

I would imagine the really good stuff is sorted through and sold via different methods. What makes it to the store is left over crap?

I had a bag stolen a while back and was surprised to learn that SFO has no real security after you drop a bag off. The 9/11 crunch focused on bags going in, so they didn’t even have cameras in the baggage processing facilities and since the airline terms of service limit payouts to like $3/pound they don’t care, either. Everyone involved was very casual about theft being routine and expected, so I would be somewhat surprised if the lost luggage didn’t have a similar fate.

Re: A company that sells lost airplane luggage

#46
post #31

When it was founded 50 Yeats ago _maybe_ it made sense because technology was not that advanced. Now I'd say it's a company selling stolen goods. Airlines know who is the owner of that luggage. They have the sticker with flight, booking number, they have the contact details of the owner, and most owners put a tag with their contact info on the luggage. They were hired to provide the sole service of transporting the l…

> Now I'd say it's a company selling stolen goods. "Imagine this: An airline loses your checked bag. After an extensive search, customer support comes up empty-handed. They compensate you and life goes on." It seems bizarre to call this stolen goods when the airline has tried to resolve this for 90 days AND compensated you for your loss

Exactly, but the issue is that a person might be willing to pay that compensation fee for the original bag back.

Some bags had valuable artifacts, a camera used by NASA, etc. I’m sure the airlines didn’t compensate for this sort of items.

Regardless, the company selling this is not at fault for selling “stolen” items. They believe the airline has done its due diligence in trying to find the owner and are now reducing waste by giving the items a 2nd home.

Re: A company that sells lost airplane luggage

#47
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I did. Are you saying 25m bags have absolutely no information on them? Absolutely zero?

Did you read the sentence right after that one? "Around 25m of them (5.7 per 1k bags checked) end up lost or misdirected. The 0.03% of bags that are still not reunited with their owners after 90 days are sold by the airline." 0.03% of 25m, and it's only after 90 days.

I'm pretty sure that's a mistake. 1.3M are never claimed according to the figures early on, that's 0.003% of the total figure.

Re: A company that sells lost airplane luggage

#49

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Probably comes down to how difficult it is to gain access, and whether that's destructive.

You can put whatever locks you want on your bags, but the TSA can and will cut anything they can't easily open. https://www.tsa.gov/blog/2014/02/18/tsa-travel-tips-tuesday-...

I absolutely get that. But this private company is not the TSA, either.

Re: A company that sells lost airplane luggage

#50
post #31

When it was founded 50 Yeats ago _maybe_ it made sense because technology was not that advanced. Now I'd say it's a company selling stolen goods. Airlines know who is the owner of that luggage. They have the sticker with flight, booking number, they have the contact details of the owner, and most owners put a tag with their contact info on the luggage. They were hired to provide the sole service of transporting the l…

If the contents of the bag are worth $500 the airline isn't spending >$500 worth of effort to track it down and return it to its owner. It makes sense to just reimburse them and move on.

Now the question is what happens to the bag floating in the ether. Option 1 is sending it to a landfill. Option 2 is cracking it open and reselling/reusing the stuff in it. There are plenty of ethical arguments in either one's favor, but it isn't as obvious as everyone is making it seem.

Post reply on HN