81–90 of 96 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Google is fighting for its life here. They are not worried about cost.
Then what's your explanation for them not deploying Gemini? It's either to expensive or they just don't think it's that important to have a competitive, accessible model out there (which is a valid stance imo).
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Bard is free, while GPT-4 is not, so it doesn’t seem like a totally fair comparison. Also what a wild comparison, because afaik chat gpt can’t make charts either.
It absolutely can. Try asking ChatGPT4 something like "Please draw a chart of the population of Switzerland over the past 20 years". It will write Python code to use matplotlib and the resulting chart will appear in the chat. I'd show an example but their sharing feature doesn't work with images for some reason.
I tried this on the free version you can get to without paying anything, I didn't realize the advanced version supported this.
I'm curious about how the benchmark is done. I suspect it can be improved in order to represent user's / usability expectations. I gave Bard a go, after seeing Jeff Dean's tweet. It's just as frustrating as it was, compared to GPT-4. It's simply off the question and unable to realize it's off. I asked it to generate a chart and 3 times it came back with "here's a chart" with no chart, finally saying it doesn't have t…
My favourite by miles was asking bard for some more mathematical examples after explaining quantum field theory quite well in words, to which it said "Ok here are some examples of mathematics: 2+2=4"
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Lazy??? What does it mean for a model to be lazy?
Q: Please write me a function that makes a couple of text edits and a button. A: Certainly! Here is a function that makes a couple of text edits and a button. function renderForm() { var edit = document.createElement('input'); // The rest of the code is similar. }
I'm curious about how the benchmark is done. I suspect it can be improved in order to represent user's / usability expectations. I gave Bard a go, after seeing Jeff Dean's tweet. It's just as frustrating as it was, compared to GPT-4. It's simply off the question and unable to realize it's off. I asked it to generate a chart and 3 times it came back with "here's a chart" with no chart, finally saying it doesn't have t…
You’re probably using the old Bard model. You can try the new one, bard-jan-24-gemini-pro, by clicking the Direct Chat tab on https://chat.lmsys.org .
I'm curious about how the benchmark is done. I suspect it can be improved in order to represent user's / usability expectations. I gave Bard a go, after seeing Jeff Dean's tweet. It's just as frustrating as it was, compared to GPT-4. It's simply off the question and unable to realize it's off. I asked it to generate a chart and 3 times it came back with "here's a chart" with no chart, finally saying it doesn't have t…
? https://i.imgur.com/b0fIGyS.png
Here you go https://imgur.com/a/MT04viM
I'm curious about how the benchmark is done. I suspect it can be improved in order to represent user's / usability expectations. I gave Bard a go, after seeing Jeff Dean's tweet. It's just as frustrating as it was, compared to GPT-4. It's simply off the question and unable to realize it's off. I asked it to generate a chart and 3 times it came back with "here's a chart" with no chart, finally saying it doesn't have t…
Bard is free, while GPT-4 is not, so it doesn’t seem like a totally fair comparison. Also what a wild comparison, because afaik chat gpt can’t make charts either.
how is GPT4-Turbo higher than GPT-4?
It's actually better. All the people claiming unannounced updates make OpenAI model significantly worse were misled by their own lying eyes. It's so hard to believe, I know, but it's true.
for me Bard is much better than ChatGPT... I wish I would be using an uncensored Mistral though.
"mommy, can we get GPT?" "we have GPT at home darling"