Live data from Hacker News

Machine Learning Is Still Too Hard for Software Engineers

nyckel.com

111–112 of 112 posts

Re: Machine Learning Is Still Too Hard for Software Engineers

#111
There was a talk at PyCon Sweden by a Huggingface dev who showcased some of the tools they have for making ML (specifically transformers) making feel like "standard" software dev: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fckyXntHy1s

In particular treating datasets as "repos" analogous to how code can be versioned seems like a really good way forward.

Re: Machine Learning Is Still Too Hard for Software Engineers

#112

I feel so validated by this article. I took two semesters of machine learning electives for my CS masters and feel nearly as ignorant and mystified as when I started. I worked so hard to create something useful and at the end of the day, my work felt like it was 96% example code with modifications hacked in to make it work. And in the end it was still terrible! At least now I know what people are talking about when d…

I don't think it's as complicated as it might seem, if you break it down.

I think the real blocker is time; modern software devs are expected to be across the whole stack. You can't have one person write your backend, frontend, infra, db admin, build ml architecture, train model, etc. It's just too much.

It's just specialising really, wide and shallow vs narrow but deep domains. Forefront of ML stuff requires researchers specialised in that domain, same as any I guess.

Post reply on HN