I realized chess pieces can be redesigned to be geometric attack directions
11–20 of 269 posts
Re: I realized chess pieces can be redesigned to be geometric attack directions
#12That is very clever! But I hate the way the pawns face. Makes sense! But it still reads, to me, like one of those "color, but the text is in a different color" things. Feels like the pawns should be facing the opposite direction. =/
Re: I realized chess pieces can be redesigned to be geometric attack directions
#13I suspect Josef Hartwig would like a word https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josef_Hartwig#Chess_sets https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bauhaus-Schachspiel
Re: I realized chess pieces can be redesigned to be geometric attack directions
#14What I enjoy about this design is it exploits the correlation between piece value with the number of ways it can move, resulting in a visual intuition that more visually complex pieces are worth more on average. The knight is perhaps the frustrating exceptions to this.
This is why rooks are worth 5 and bishops are worth 3, despite both having apparently equal freedom of movement (just rotated 45 degrees). The bishop will be able to access strictly fewer squares than the rook even in the best case, and usually much fewer. And the bishop is stuck on one color.
Re: I realized chess pieces can be redesigned to be geometric attack directions
#15Re: I realized chess pieces can be redesigned to be geometric attack directions
#16Re: I realized chess pieces can be redesigned to be geometric attack directions
#17I suspect Josef Hartwig would like a word https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josef_Hartwig#Chess_sets https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bauhaus-Schachspiel
And it looks so much more reasonable, I would say
Re: I realized chess pieces can be redesigned to be geometric attack directions
#18I suspect Josef Hartwig would like a word https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Josef_Hartwig#Chess_sets https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bauhaus-Schachspiel