Live data from Hacker News

Only 90s Web Developers Remember This (2014)

zachholman.com

141–150 of 407 posts

Re: Only 90s Web Developers Remember This (2014)

#141
> tiny six-point font

I remember it more as a "eight-point" font and its multiple (next ideal being 16-point).

Not in the 90s, but in the early 2000s, I reaped Pixel Fonts' benefit to its fullest. Besides using it as part of the graphics and later sliced for HTML, I used it to render many elements of Apps/programs for Pocket PC devices -- iPAQ[1]. Even though the devices were small, they were handheld and usually used closer to the eyes than desktops, and the pixel fonts were ideal size to give enough spacing and clarity to buttons and even for the smaller text that goes in the mandatory legal writings that need to go with the programs used by Healthcare professionals.

I was lucky to be involved in creating a few such programs for physicians and clinics, making them really happy users. I remember that positioning other fonts (I think, system fonts, etc) was hard to maintain and turned out blurry when deployed to these devices. The Pixel Fonts were crisp and clear when re-aligned after calculating either an even or an odd pixel placement.

It was my second job and first Internet/Web-related Job. My boss was super happy that he spent money on my suggested items, which were repaid repeatedly.

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPAQ

Re: Only 90s Web Developers Remember This (2014)

#142

> To this day it is the only way to vertically center elements. Not true anymore (edit: didn't see the 2014) but the productivity cost of not being able to just "vertical-align: middle;" inside divs for the last 30 years must be billions of dollars. Also does anyone remember the fade of the overline style on :hover links? It must has been around the IE4 or IE6 era. Tables were also used to make divs and buttons with…

It's still a huge PITA and requires all sorts of subtle understandings. Even in tailwindcss it's not simple, you need to think about what kind of element is it (block or not), is it text or not, what layout is on the parent, yada yada yada.

Re: Only 90s Web Developers Remember This (2014)

#143

I still miss browser bouncers: "Sorry kiddo. No Netscape in here. Boss created this stuff for IE only."

Those still exist, but sites don't tell you about it anymore. Instead the sites are just broken for you. We do still get notices for using for ad blockers on some sites at least. https://old.reddit.com/r/uBlockOrigin/comments/18autyy/cnnco...

Re: Only 90s Web Developers Remember This (2014)

#146
post #135

Don't forget that tables could be used for rounded corners. Or maybe I'm an early 00s web developer with that? The trick is that we created 3×3 tables, and aside of the middle cell, it would contain s, so that the creation was a website element with rounded edges, the pinnacle of human expressiveness. Since HTML emails were also the rage, and email clients updated much slower than browsers, this technique was used we…

And right at the time we got border radius the design trend changed and nobody wanted round corners anymore

I still want round corners! Square corners feel claustrophobic.

Re: Only 90s Web Developers Remember This (2014)

#147
post #17

I don't remember if this was a common technique, but before XmlHttpRequest (came in 2000, i think) we used to do "Ajax" by loading data into an invisible iframe and reading the contents. Worked well iirc.

did you ping pong communicate data back and forth between iframe and "main frame" like a queue/pipe?

Re: Only 90s Web Developers Remember This (2014)

#148

One thing I miss from the 90s are the built in user/password dialog that enabled me to easily remember passwords. It still exists, but most sites prefer to use their own HTML based logins because it "looks ugly". Imagine if sites used the built in dialog; We would have a much more secure web. We would not have a need for dedicated password managers and would probably have found a low effort way of integrating auto ge…

You mean Basic HTTP Authentication? I wouldn't say Chrome's dialog looks 'ugly'.
Post reply on HN