Live data from Hacker News

Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

sharedrop.io

141–150 of 156 posts

Re: Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

#141
post #94

I'm not a big fan of having to pay once for every computer I want to use something on. I'm just 1 person. Also, making it free for Android but not PC seems... Wrong.

What are you talking about? This tool is free for everyone.

I somehow managed to reply to the wrong one. Ubidrop is the one I meant to reply to.

Re: Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

#142
post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Who cares about money? Being free seems much more important.

Is this some sort of HN meme where we purposely use the wrong word sense of "free" in order to stir a semantic argument?

No.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_and_open-source_software

Re: Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

#143

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Bluetooth does it too!

At first, I thought you were alluding to Bluetooth file sharing, which Apple doesn’t support.

I was referring to frequency hopping. In any case Apple does support Bluetooth file transfer on macOS, just not on iOS.

Re: Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

#144
post #113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thanks for the link. Looking through the Github, this appears to be close to what I'm looking for on my own project. Namely, being able to share files automatically with nearby devices when they move within range. I thought Bluetooth might be viable, as beacons and GattServers seem to be designed for this purpose. Android's implementation was painful, yet doable. However, after wading into Microsoft's codebase, I sus…

It's a very cool idea, but the first barrier that comes to mind would be that when the clients join the hotspots, they don't have internet access, so joining the network would mean losing internet, for laptops and phones without cellular data. I know the LocalOnlyHotspot API I use on Android doesn't offer internet tethering. I'm not sure how possible it is to ensure that on Windows and Linux devices that host hotspot…

Thanks. Those are the kind of issues I was worried about with a superficial glance. The general idea looks tempting ("send files to nearby devices"). However, dropping connectivity every time would probably be a deal breaker. I was hoping you might be able to connect for like 10-20 seconds, grab a few kB of files, and then continue on your way, having a spotty, partial connectivity to other devices while wandering the above mall scenario.

Re: Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

#145
post #21

If you already use Tailscale, Taildrop [1] works great. [1] https://tailscale.com/kb/1106/taildrop

From that doc:

> Taildrop is currently limited to sending files between your own personal devices. You cannot send files to devices owned by other users even on the same Tailscale network.

Re: Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

#146
post #9

All of these "alternatives to airdop" don't seem to actually do what airdrop does, which is create an ad-hoc wireless connection. Airdrop isn't just a nice UI for sending files between people, it allows a wi-fi speed transfer between two devices that aren't connected to an existing network of that speed.

> create an ad-hoc wireless connection. Every Android device I've used has had "Send via Bluetooth" functionality built in. Is the WiFi connection just significantly faster or does it provide other additional benefits?

most wifi is probably 2 orders of magnitude faster than bluetooth transfer. Syncthing is great if you're looking for multiplatform syncing of files. It takes a little playing around though, the interface is not what I would call beginner friendly, but it's not too bad, and has been very dependable in my experience

Re: Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

#147

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You’re kidding, but a working phone was found on the ground after the panel blew out of the Boeing a few weeks ago. https://www.theverge.com/2024/1/8/24029806/boeing-737-max-9-... I don’t think there’s anything in a phone that’d stop its core functions in a vacuum. The human trying to use it, not so much.

I was kind of kidding, but I was also kind of intrigued by the idea. My instinct is that it would work in a vacuum, but that is just a gut feeling. But I also could not think of why one could not.

Overheating could be a problem. cooling by thermal radiation alone maybe isn't enough

Re: Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

#148
post #145
post #21

If you already use Tailscale, Taildrop [1] works great. [1] https://tailscale.com/kb/1106/taildrop

From that doc: > Taildrop is currently limited to sending files between your own personal devices. You cannot send files to devices owned by other users even on the same Tailscale network.

Good point, it doesn't quite fit the same purpose as AirDrop & other alternatives. Useful if you want to share files between your devices though!

Re: Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

#149
post #82
post #9

All of these "alternatives to airdop" don't seem to actually do what airdrop does, which is create an ad-hoc wireless connection. Airdrop isn't just a nice UI for sending files between people, it allows a wi-fi speed transfer between two devices that aren't connected to an existing network of that speed.

Mine does! https://github.com/spieglt/flyingcarpet

This serves the purpose of cross-platform file sharing. Great job.

Re: Free and Open Source Alternative to Airdrop

#150
post #125

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is this some sort of HN meme where we purposely use the wrong word sense of "free" in order to stir a semantic argument?

No. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_and_open-source_software

I hate this. That's not what free means to 99% of consumers. I refuse to use it that way.
Post reply on HN